Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wondering, after a debate that got going in the family room, how many of you would be shocked to learn that an individual income of 45k probably puts you in the top 10% of earners in the UK?


Everyone talks of London being an exception but based on this government report, average HOUSEHOLD (not individual income) is only 900 per week and 60k household income makes you top 10% of households in the UK and top 17% of households in London...


Anyone richer than they thought?!



http://data.london.gov.uk/documents/FocusOnLondon2010-income-and-spending.pdf

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25907-house-hold-income/
Share on other sites

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Everyone talks of London being an exception but

> based on this government report, average HOUSEHOLD

> (not individual income) is only 900 per week and

> 60k household income makes you top 10% of

> households in the UK and top 17% of households in

> London...


"Only" ?900 per week? That's the problem with averages - because there's a well-defined minimum income (?0), but no maximum, averages give an unrealistically generous impression, especially in London. As the document says "The difference between the mean and median measure of individual income in London was more than ?15,000", which is quite a lot. Or, if my sums are right*, 70% of households in London earn less than the average.


It's also worth noting that most of the data comes from HMRC data, which reports only on taxpayers. Those who have been 'taken out of tax' are as hidden here as anywhere (except in Chart 2 which does include benefit income and seems to cover around 3m households, which seems about right), and that's going to further inflate the averages given.


Of the taxpaying homes, they state that 24% bring in less than ?300 per week (?15.6k), or less than a third of the average. That's a bit more than minimum wage, and about what the Joseph Rowntree Foundation reckon's a reasonable living wage (though not necessarily in London) for an individual.


This isn't good, and it's clearly not getting better, especially given these numbers exclude non-taxpayers who (despite the Guardian, are more likely to be poor than rich). I'd guess one of the key reasons for the situation is the changing nature of employment. The shockingly small incomes from 'self employment' might reflect back-bedroom hobbies and the under-reporting of cash-in-hand trade, but it's as likely to be because the lowest paid workers - cleaners, security guards, carers etc - are increasingly being taken on a self-employed or casual basis, leaving the burdens of national insurance, sick pay, pension contributions etc. to the worker.


It's a common argument that large employers are, in this way, forcing the taxpayer to subsidise their businesses, and there's some truth to that. Except that we're a long way from the effects being felt by the state. It's only much later, when illness, redundancy (without redundancy pay) or the non-existent pension, kick in, that the state will be left holding the pieces. In the meantime, it's the worker, whose real-terms income has been slowly and invisibly cut by 20% or more, who has to cope. Which is possibly why those in the 70% aren't so easily impressed by public-sector whinges about pay freezes, despite the best efforts of the Guardian's interns.


The trouble is that only politicians can solve this, and it's politicians that won't. They don't want to upset businesses, and they don't want to be seen to be spending more. So they find ways to blame the previous administration or kick the issue into the next one and, in the meantime, talk about 'change' and 'vision' and 'fairness' while doing stuff all about it. OK, not entirely stuff-all. But when giving people the 'right' to request 'flexible hours' from their boss without being sacked for their temerity turns out to be the best** a "Labour" government could do in thirteen years, it would take a certifiable sort of optimist to hold out any hope.


*As the data behind the Paycheck-derived barchart isn't freely available, I rescaled and measured the bars to get these figures, using the 'two in five households in London had an annual income between ?15,000 and ?35,000' line for the percentage conversion. As I am old and slapdash, they might be out by a tiny bit.


**The Agency Workers Directive might, conceivably, improve the lives of some. But it's too early to say yet and I, personally, doubt it'll do anything but shift even more workers off the books.


Disclaimer: My choice of Saturday-night activity is no reflection of either my income or my prospects.

 

I've got no guilt as I worked hard to get where I am and don't come from a wealthy background. Still, based on some comments on the forum some of the middle class in Dulwich seem to be confused and think "middle class" means average. Just wanted to provide a bit of a reality check as there are lots of threads discussing the various government cuts at the moment. Some forumites are "outraged" that their nannies will be limited to only 1 session of Sure Start a week so the program can better reach its target audience. Some are even threatening to commit tax fraud to keep their child benefit!


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Guardian readers on average earn ?30,500 per

> year

> > compared to the UK average of ?21,000 and are

> > twice as likely as the average UK adult to earn

> > ?40,000 or more.

>

> MIddle Class guilt RIGHT THERE

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?2

> 9,960124,page=1

>

> Extraordinary expectations of entitlement...


I haven't laughed so much at a thread for ages. Then I realised they were actually being serious...

That's pretty disgusting.


Why don't they demand a slice of single parents' benefits while they are at it, after all their taxes pay for it!


I am totally gobsmacked that these women can't see why underprivileged kids should be prioritised and why nannies trained in child care don't need the services as much as some poor girl bringing up a baby on her own.


Shame on you selfish, self-absorbed and greedy women.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Once and for all, middle class and working class

> DO NOT EXIST ANYMORE!!!!!

>

> And if they do, it's about your world view, not

> your income.


Surely wealth created the original class system and income and class remain interlinked today.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...