Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For lack of anywhere else to rant, I just wanted to let it out about Riverford Organic.


I get a box every week. Last week I splashed out and added some Olive and Tomato Focaccia to my order, as my 4 year old loves focaccia. She is highly dairy allergic. I checked the ingredients several times - no milk.


Then, for 4 nights - she was constantly waking up screaming in pain with chronic wind - and had tummy ache all day. I thought she was ill and she missed a few days of school (bearing in mind she has only just started school). Then on nights 3 and 4, when the calpol clearly wasn't working, we decided to try antihistamine - instant response with the wind but she still had tummy ache in the day. I checked everything she had had several times, no dairy - and concluded she must have been eating out of other children's lunch boxes - cue firm mummy talk about not eating other people's food.


So on Saturday I decided to email Riverford to double check the focaccia had no dairy in it. Got a response saying I would hear back in 48 hours. No response so far. So today I rang my local franchisee - she checked online - it says the focaccia had buttermilk as the second ingredient! I have a pdf of the page from Saturday - it doesn't list buttermilk. Clearly, we both think - they are covering their backs. And yet no phone call to me.


In the end I ring the press office as the only HO number I can find. Eventually some 12 year old who is head of customer services calls me back to apologise. He clearly has no idea of the seriousness of this. No promise to end contract wit the bakery, no promise to investigate or to go through all their website to check accuracy of ingredients. No offer even of any compensation, free box - not that that is the point and would probably not have sated my anger. Needless to say I have cancelled any future deliveries.


Unbelievable though from a company who pretend to be ethical. Can I take this any further does anyone know? Is it a trading standards issue?



Susypx

Hi Suzy...I'd be pretty p****d off - I think you have a right to be. I have friend with a child with worse allergies than yours; the consequences could be even worse. Could you try the advertising standards agency (as the product was not as advertised)?- or local trading standards? (I think such a thing exists). I emailed the ASA in a Groupon rage quite recently and they got back to me quickly...

Interesting link Saffron thanks.

Hoping this may have been why she appeared to have an infection we corresponded about on Sunday! As buttermilk is probably one of the worst things she can have. It kind of explains everything that's been going on with her health wise.

I've now heard from someone more senior at Riverford that they are taking this seriously and investigating it properly - and will come back to me with the findings. Which really is what I wanted.

Making our own bread now. We already make our own cakes so it's not that much of a stretch hopefully.

And to think that 4 years ago I couldn't cook for toffee - now making bread and cakes myself!!

Just shows you nothing is impossible!

susypx

Glad to hear it. Sorry to hear. I was surprised to hear that you had heard nothing, knowing how caring and ethical they are, it seemed incongruous. Sometimes these things take a little time to filter through to those more senior. They are usually really efficient. I think |Riverford are great. Really fresh food and a really good service. I hope it all gets sorted out. It seems that their food is produced by local bakeries in your area rather than their own. It may have been a mistake on the bakeries part, and not their own, but it's good that they are taking it seriously and dealing with it.

susyp Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting link Saffron thanks.

> Hoping this may have been why she appeared to have

> an infection we corresponded about on Sunday! As

> buttermilk is probably one of the worst things she

> can have. It kind of explains everything that's

> been going on with her health wise.


Yes, food allergies and intollerances can manifest in odd ways. I can imagine that upset of gastric fauna can have additional effects elsewhere in the body. Can you get dairy free probiotics? Does such a thing exist? (I'm thinking that many probiotics are cultured in milk? If not, I see a gap in the market!) Hope your LO is feeling better. xx

Non-diary probiotics here - http://www.livestrong.com/article/265506-can-people-on-a-dairy-free-diet-take-probiotics/ although I'd congratulate any parent who can get saurkraut down the throats of their little ones (mine do actually like it but they are strange).


There is mention of soya yoghurts but they are not suitable for all dairy allergies. I happen to get symptoms as bad as with milk when I eat soya yoghurt but not when I eat other types of soya bean products. For me, it all depends on how it is prepared.

Mmm, I love saurkraut. It was standard around our house as children - Mother's family is of Czech heritage. Weirdly Little Saff loves pickled beetroot, must be her grandmother's genes.


Going to buy some on the way home. We haven't had any in ages! Thanks for the idea.

arg it's still going on despite piriton - I am loathe to give too much as it makes her exhausted - last few nights waking up screaming in pain with wind and tummy ache in day. She actually seems quite happy but I am a wreck!

At least I have clarified, yes she is still very allergic.

Sigh

Susypx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...