Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Eh? Schofield's a tabloid style journalist on allow brow mid morning TV show that has a populist agenda promoting lightweight celebrity.


He did exactly what he was supposed to do, and asked the question that his audiences want answering from their suburban armchairs.

  • 3 weeks later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jessie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm far more interested in what the hospitals

> and

> > children's homes have to say for themselves.

> BBC

> > is a v easy target for right wing press and its

> > followers.

>

>

> Mmmmm. Another sacred cow which can,t be

> criticised without rasing the normal defensive

> hogwash? Rubbish, it failed miserably and almost

> systematically for years on the abuse and more

> recently by , at best, ignoring it. Not the only

> guilt party but so what.


Cyril Smith - another 'Sir' (although Jimmy S wasn't a 'proper' one).

Nothing to do with the Beeb this time. Accusers were boys, not girls. 'Everyone' knew in Rochdale and elsewhere, but found it convenient to turn a blind eye.

The only commonality is that both exploited very young people, counting on their victims' powerlessness to keep themselves safe from public exposure. How many others?

There most probably will be some sick twisted people who will take advantage of this situation to get money! But the real survivors of Jimmy Seville's evil crimes will have a statement to make which the police can check with other statements of victim's and you would be surprised how the evidence comes together! The investigations are very thorough and intrusive..... I bet the faker's will fall short one way or another.
Apparently not, although the Twitter account I saw (ITV producer of Savile expose) it was reporting that a certain person had been arrested/questioned in relation to the Savile enquiry, rather than saying xyz is a paedo/he's got bodies of children buried in his garden etc...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...