Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Eh? Schofield's a tabloid style journalist on allow brow mid morning TV show that has a populist agenda promoting lightweight celebrity.


He did exactly what he was supposed to do, and asked the question that his audiences want answering from their suburban armchairs.

  • 3 weeks later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jessie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm far more interested in what the hospitals

> and

> > children's homes have to say for themselves.

> BBC

> > is a v easy target for right wing press and its

> > followers.

>

>

> Mmmmm. Another sacred cow which can,t be

> criticised without rasing the normal defensive

> hogwash? Rubbish, it failed miserably and almost

> systematically for years on the abuse and more

> recently by , at best, ignoring it. Not the only

> guilt party but so what.


Cyril Smith - another 'Sir' (although Jimmy S wasn't a 'proper' one).

Nothing to do with the Beeb this time. Accusers were boys, not girls. 'Everyone' knew in Rochdale and elsewhere, but found it convenient to turn a blind eye.

The only commonality is that both exploited very young people, counting on their victims' powerlessness to keep themselves safe from public exposure. How many others?

There most probably will be some sick twisted people who will take advantage of this situation to get money! But the real survivors of Jimmy Seville's evil crimes will have a statement to make which the police can check with other statements of victim's and you would be surprised how the evidence comes together! The investigations are very thorough and intrusive..... I bet the faker's will fall short one way or another.
Apparently not, although the Twitter account I saw (ITV producer of Savile expose) it was reporting that a certain person had been arrested/questioned in relation to the Savile enquiry, rather than saying xyz is a paedo/he's got bodies of children buried in his garden etc...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We did fine for 300 years with the Royal Mail before the current "competitive" shambles was introduced. Now we have multiple companies with multiple vehicles making deliveries to the same streets every day, none of the workers are employees with decent working conditions or any job security, and consumers have to deal with x different distribution networks and apps and platforms and drop-off points... https://postandparcel.info/12422/news/uk-royal-mails-monopoly-to-end-on-1-january-2006/
    • That's certainly the narrative that runs ad infinitum on the Forum but I wonder how true it is. Speaking for myself I'm very happy M&S, Superdrug, Pret and, in the last century, Sainsbury's arrived and judging from the business they do I'm not alone.
    • There are Christmas lights?! Or a, I missing something?
    • Though it's often the big corporates who dig deepest. For small independents that's a bigger ask, decorating, when they do their own premises is cost enough. And we're normally happy not to have the big corporates in LL. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...