Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Eh? Schofield's a tabloid style journalist on allow brow mid morning TV show that has a populist agenda promoting lightweight celebrity.


He did exactly what he was supposed to do, and asked the question that his audiences want answering from their suburban armchairs.

  • 3 weeks later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jessie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm far more interested in what the hospitals

> and

> > children's homes have to say for themselves.

> BBC

> > is a v easy target for right wing press and its

> > followers.

>

>

> Mmmmm. Another sacred cow which can,t be

> criticised without rasing the normal defensive

> hogwash? Rubbish, it failed miserably and almost

> systematically for years on the abuse and more

> recently by , at best, ignoring it. Not the only

> guilt party but so what.


Cyril Smith - another 'Sir' (although Jimmy S wasn't a 'proper' one).

Nothing to do with the Beeb this time. Accusers were boys, not girls. 'Everyone' knew in Rochdale and elsewhere, but found it convenient to turn a blind eye.

The only commonality is that both exploited very young people, counting on their victims' powerlessness to keep themselves safe from public exposure. How many others?

There most probably will be some sick twisted people who will take advantage of this situation to get money! But the real survivors of Jimmy Seville's evil crimes will have a statement to make which the police can check with other statements of victim's and you would be surprised how the evidence comes together! The investigations are very thorough and intrusive..... I bet the faker's will fall short one way or another.
Apparently not, although the Twitter account I saw (ITV producer of Savile expose) it was reporting that a certain person had been arrested/questioned in relation to the Savile enquiry, rather than saying xyz is a paedo/he's got bodies of children buried in his garden etc...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • For anyone interested in the conservation of birds, here's a reminder that It's the RSPB  bird survey this weekend. Anyone can take part and it's completely free. Just register on the RSPB website and download your bird identifier. It takes just one hour of your time to count the number and type of bird you see in your garden or local park. The more people taking part, the better we can track how well our birds are doing. It's a great activity to do with the kids and grandkids.
    • I would support bringing back some sort of sanction for not turning up (if it's not still in force).  But I think a sanction that reduces your ability to book in advance (say you go from 7 to 3 days advance) rather than a fine would be more effective and easier on the staff who work there.  It would also be more effective for rich people who might not care about paying the fines. Or you could just fine say the top 5 worst offenders in a month, which would probably take out those who had a genuine one-off emergency so couldn't turn up.
    • Just joined, thanks for organising and heads-up...
    • Whether a pool is overcrowded or not, the absence of the lifeguard is the critical factor here. To use this tragic anecdote as a reason to disregard valid points about accessibility is a reach too far and designed to emotionally blackmail anyone who disagrees with the status quo. At least some - not all - of the hours of operation ought to be for drop-ins as has been standard for decades. (Overcrowding is easily prevented with the use of wristbands and/or headcount at ticket desk, etc. - as was the case before Covid.) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...