Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You couldn't make it up.


As if they haven't done enough damage to our local transport system ffs.



https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/24-7-bus-lanes-for-major-southwark-roads-including-tower-bridge-road-and-borough-high-street/


Starts on Sunday. Don't get caught out!

Yup, pure cash grab... Pot to grab is only going to shrink more though. TFL bust and relying on central government bailouts for the foreseeable future I think?


KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "won't someone think of the revenues ?"

Yes, another example of Southwark introducing disproportionate measures, without due forethought. Ok keep buses moving when its busy, but why 24 hours?


But then there will be that additional income from all those extra fines. Now I understand!

Only blue badge parking will be retained so it sounds like there will be double red lines on the west side of Lordship Lane all the way from William Rose up to East Dulwich Grove.


That means dozens more car parking spaces will be lost next week on top of the new CPZ.

It really does appear that Southwark is being run by children with no idea how people have to earn a living. Are there enough local residents to keep the shops alive?


Because once bitten twice shy people will not bother to come.

"As we recover from coronavirus, we?re starting to see more private vehicles using parts of the road network than before? - that's because you can't pop up to Herne Hill (for example) and be sure of actually getting on the 37 after waiting for 20 minutes; or get a bus to Peckham Rye Station.


The 30 min parking on Lordship Lane is a Godsend when heading home after a trip out and you need to pick up some quick groceries or a curry; or to buy a bootful of meat from William Rose. It's like the idiots at Southwark Council think "How can we upset East Dulwich residents today?"

Trunk roads and their bus lanes are entirely TFL's domain, nothing to do with southwark. If you don't like then don't vote for the mayor.


But this is fantastic news!


More reliable bus journeys and easier cycling. More rabid motorist comments on EDF. More planters etc. What's not to like?

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So where?s the bus lane on EDG?


EDG is so narrow in places that two sizeable vehicles cannot pass each other without one stopping to let the other go by. I can only assume that this is why, until about 15 years ago, the bus route went down Melbourne Grove and not EDG. No room for a bus lane therefore. It is against this backdrop that Southwark decided it was VERY sensible to displace huge volumes of traffic onto this road.


I wonder whether they could squeeze in a bus lane down Court Lane however?!?!

Looks like this was a London assembly transport committee decision after consukting with the borough but it really isnt easy to find documents on their website.


Parking restrictions may only actually be 7am to 7pm.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the idea that there's a shadowy cabal of

> Court Lane residents that is secretly controlling

> local and London government.


Funny you should say that because years ago in the early 1990s, before they installed speed humps and the P4 was going up and down Court Lane between Lewisham and Brixton, the residents complained that ne'er-do-wells from Brixton and Lewisham were 'casing' the properties on Court Lane- (I heard that from a Southwark Councillor who lived in Court Lane!)

That sounds like a completely reliable and highly relevant anecdote.


When did the P4 run up Court Lane? I lived very close by in 89-92 and only remember it going up College Rd (as a "hail and ride" service). It's totally possible that I am misremembering.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That sounds like a completely reliable and highly

> relevant anecdote.

>

> When did the P4 run up Court Lane? I lived very

> close by in 89-92 and only remember it going up

> College Rd (as a "hail and ride" service). It's

> totally possible that I am misremembering.


When the speed humps were installed which was about 1988 or so because I remember taking my kids to school and one of them was petrified of dogs...he was about 10 at the time . A dog ran out of a front gate in Court Lane and he ran into the road in fear and I remember thinking if the speed humps hadn't been there he would have been killed. The speed humps were installed soon after a couple of schoolboys were hit by a car travelling at speed down Court Lane and overshot the bend near to the Village end, mounted the pavement and hit them both. One of them was taken to hospital but the other one was thrown into a bush in a front garden and was found later if I recall.

I lived in Eynella and often got the P4 to shop in Lewisham as the 185 takes forever

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
    • Do great pizzas there at community cafe.. lots going on — was free parking but plans  to like everywhere get folk to pay.  Nice area… only discovered it a few years ago..   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...