Jump to content

Recommended Posts

@Abe_Frorume I am confused why you are concerned by this. Ensuring buses can run better surely a good thing. Would you prefer that public transport be hampered.


Buses in South London are the most important element of the public transport infrastructure. The tube does not slow down because someone decides to block the line.


Additionally buses are using social distancing at the moment so are transporting less passengers.


Well done Southwark council for this change.

stecoward101 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @Abe_Frorume I am confused why you are concerned

> by this. Ensuring buses can run better surely a

> good thing. Would you prefer that public transport

> be hampered.

>

> Buses in South London are the most important

> element of the public transport infrastructure.

> The tube does not slow down because someone

> decides to block the line.

>

> Additionally buses are using social distancing at

> the moment so are transporting less passengers.

>

> Well done Southwark council for this change.


Southwark and TFL have to do something as busses are getting caught up in the gridlock caused by the road closures on the roads where there can be no bus lane.


I completely understand this move as if you have to do everything to encourage people out of cars and back onto public transport but I would be concerned if LL loses parking spaces at a time when the CPZ is being implemented too.

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks to me like this is TfL and doesn?t affect the stretch of Lordship Lane with parking. Maybe why people were having difficulty finding information if they were looking for Southwark.



http://lruc.content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-lane-operating-hours.pdf


If it makes a few walk when they would have driven but having thought about it decided they don?t need to drive that?s good for us all. A twenty minute walk back with shopping is doable and families might get exercise and talk rather than jump in the car, kids on their phones the whole time. Some might even prefer it once they try something they?ve not before. We use our cars too much, its too easy. Making it expensive or uncomfortable is sometimes the only way to make people think.

  • 2 weeks later...
The weekly email from TfL mentioned it so I think this has started. It only applies to the bits of Lordship Lane that are red routes - near the South Circular I think, definitely not from Goose Green to Blackwater Street (Cafe Nero to William Rose) which have yellow lines and aren?t red routes.
The bus lane sign on LL just before Overhill Road has had it changed to "At All Times" for the section of bus lane between Overhill Road and Melford Road, which is Southwark managed. (Melford Road to Wood Vale is TfL).

redpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trunk roads and their bus lanes are entirely TFL's

> domain, nothing to do with southwark. If you don't

> like then don't vote for the mayor.

>

> But this is fantastic news!

>

> More reliable bus journeys and easier cycling.

> More rabid motorist comments on EDF. More planters

> etc. What's not to like?


Are you me in disguise? Or perhaps I am you.


Funny how many posting are probably soft left, but attack their civil liberties about the right to drive when you like, where you like, why you like, and how you like and you turn into the rabid right.


There is just so much wrong with unrestricted driving. How we need a culture change in the same way that we are stunned that people used to smoke in pubs. Did that really happen?


Sadly because we can't change our habits, and government wont do the right thing including compelling authorities to put in average speed limit cameras, we get blunt instruments.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It is just a witch hunt. The estate agent has taken responsibility. FFS leave the poor woman alone.
    • As said, why are you not eating humble pie for a non-story? I expect that scores of landlords are unaware or made mistakes in this territory.  And this is not just the Chancellor but a married couple.  It feels like you and others are taking joy in demonising her. The only question would be is the house suitable for renting out?  I expect it is, and if not that is up to Southwark to take action rather than keyboard warriors.  The only surprises are the expense of licensing - surely time for a thread on "is licensing a money maker for local authorities?".  I'm being facetious.  And that the cost of rental, which feels fairly reasonable based on this area. By all means go after rogue landlords.  Be my guest.  I was horrified to see some of the properties rented in London and beyond by family members.  Not all bad. Oh and another question.  Haven't I got better things to do than comment on this 'no story here' thread?  😁
    • Week 10 fixtures...   Saturday 1st November Brighton & Hove Albion v Leeds United Burnley v Arsenal Crystal Palace v Brentford  Fulham v Wolverhampton Wanderers Nottingham Forest v Manchester United Tottenham Hotspur v Chelsea Liverpool v Aston Villa   Sunday 2nd November West Ham United v Newcastle United Manchester City v AFC Bournemouth   Monday 3rd November Sunderland v Everton
    • Can you let me know if you see this again today? I'll investigate if so.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...