Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Cheltenham Road this evening: White van man and 343 in a standoff. White van man declares no way is he getting out the way and goes for a lie down in the back of his van. 20 mins later with 4 343s & 2 484s going nowhere fast, someone had to get in the van and move it - the original driver was still in the back - you couldn't make it up.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26300-cheltenham-road-nutter/
Share on other sites

No, not me, lol. It was my other half who observed the drama unfold. He was waiting for a bus at the Surrey Rd stop and went down to investigate when it was clear nothing was moving fast. Once passengers had started baying for the driver's blood - you can imagine how heated it was getting - I think it was either one of the bus drivers or the inspector who took matters into their own hands, seeing as the keys had been left in the ignition. Apparantly, the van had rounded the corner from Ivydale onto Cheltenham that fast it was on two wheels and when he was unable to continue, his two passengers got out and ran off. So there's some kind of story there - I believe the inspector kept hold of the keys to wait for the police.


Once the van had been moved, it was rather unfortunate that the very next vehicle to round the corner was another white van! He was sufficiently panicked by his reception that he couldn't get into reverse and when he did, his route was blocked by all the cars which had backed up down the side streets. What are the chances, hey, lol..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The local councillor in question took home £50,172.71 in allowances and expenses in 23/24 on top of his full time salary as a teacher (which includes several weeks paid holiday). https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-12/Member allowances 2023-24 - individual figures.pdf   I'm sure many hard working people at Sainsbury's would be delighted to make quite so much money.
    • Did anything actually crash into a pedestrian? Hope they are ok if so.
    • I don't care particularly for McAsh, the Greens or their drugs policy, but this "Greens will feed your children crack at school" stuff from the Daily Mail is just hysterical nonsense. Labour should be ashamed for seeding it - and the Mail doesn't know any better. Meanwhile, I can't remember the exact Tweet I saw recently but it was something like "some people who believe all politicians are out to enrich themselves only say that because they can't imagine serving their community for its own sake". The idea that serving as a local councillor (including dealing with the public, internal party politics - which is always the most vicious where the stakes are lowest, and plenty of unpaid prep work) is a great pathway for careerists and moneygrabbers is utter shite. On a per hour basis you'd be far better off working at Sainsbos.
    • That’s awful - I really hope no one is seriously injured. It might be worth updating the title so it clearly reflects what happened: a driver crashed into a pedestrian. The way we describe collisions matters, because it shapes how people understand responsibility and risk. If a cyclist hit someone, it would sound odd to say “bike hit pedestrian” without mentioning the rider - yet when cars are involved, the driver often disappears from the wording. Using accurate language isn’t about blaming anyone before the facts are known; it’s simply about recognising that vehicles don’t act on their own. Drivers have agency, and it would be helpful if the wording reflected that.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...