Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Cheltenham Road this evening: White van man and 343 in a standoff. White van man declares no way is he getting out the way and goes for a lie down in the back of his van. 20 mins later with 4 343s & 2 484s going nowhere fast, someone had to get in the van and move it - the original driver was still in the back - you couldn't make it up.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26300-cheltenham-road-nutter/
Share on other sites

No, not me, lol. It was my other half who observed the drama unfold. He was waiting for a bus at the Surrey Rd stop and went down to investigate when it was clear nothing was moving fast. Once passengers had started baying for the driver's blood - you can imagine how heated it was getting - I think it was either one of the bus drivers or the inspector who took matters into their own hands, seeing as the keys had been left in the ignition. Apparantly, the van had rounded the corner from Ivydale onto Cheltenham that fast it was on two wheels and when he was unable to continue, his two passengers got out and ran off. So there's some kind of story there - I believe the inspector kept hold of the keys to wait for the police.


Once the van had been moved, it was rather unfortunate that the very next vehicle to round the corner was another white van! He was sufficiently panicked by his reception that he couldn't get into reverse and when he did, his route was blocked by all the cars which had backed up down the side streets. What are the chances, hey, lol..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...