Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Unless its more about the selfish idiots who think that animals are disposable creatures that they can palm off to someone else on a whim, as said above."


Pretty much the point I thought I was making - thanks Katie :-) Plus, once a young animal has outgrown its baby cuteness, it becomes so much harder to rehome and the animal shelters are heaving with unwanted animals already.

The Minkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> once a young animal has

> outgrown its baby cuteness, it becomes so much

> harder to rehome


Exactly my point - so why bother going to all that trouble trying?


And those poor deluded fools who still think their 4 year old mog is 'cute' should be made to face up to reality, get rid and get a younger model.


A kitten is for cuteness, not for life.

I think woodrot's point is that we've had a disproportionate number of threads similar to this.


Should pet owners should be more responsible? Yes. Does the subject warrant the number (and intensity) of debates we've had on these pages? No way.

So that the forum can go back to its true business of utterly inane news threads and threads about watching threads about wool?


Should pet owners be more responsible? Yes.

And should the Forum keep reminding them to continue to be responsible? Yes

In your opinion Jeremy, if threads like these help in any way, then its a good thing, some of us like me really love and respect our animals and hate to see them being got rid of in this throw away society, I spose if people don't want to read these threads or comment then they don't have to, theres plenty of things on here for everybody

civilservant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So that the forum can go back to its true business

> of utterly inane news threads and threads about

> watching threads about wool?

>


Is that any worse than being a sluice for the out-pourings of the emotionally incontinent?


"And should the Forum keep reminding them to continue to be responsible? Yes."


Oh it should, should it? And you are the voice of the forum?


The reason this thread is getting a hard time is that it is not about ED (hence it's place in the lounge alongside the blue wool ephemera) but rather about a woman in Putney doing something (legal) that someone objects to.


Others do not.


I do not.


Maybe some people need 'reminding' that they don't speak for everybody.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe some people need 'reminding' that they don't

> speak for everybody.


Including yourself of course, maxxi?


This thread is about our throwaway culture and the need for instant gratification at any cost

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't see why Sabrina isn't taking the obvious

> option open to those who live so close to the

> river.


Maybe Sabrina IS building a rear extension with a sun deck (overlooking the river) maxxi.

civilservant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Maybe some people need 'reminding' that they

> don't

> > speak for everybody.

>

> Including yourself of course, maxxi?



Absolutely including me.


I speak for myself and none other which is why I don't pronounce on what the Forum should say or do -


I do not sprawl over the Family Room criticising talk of pushchairs and rarely make facile jokes in the Drawing Room but this is the Lounge and I like to give my inanities free range -


@ Nette - I think I have seen pictures of Sabrina's rear extension and whilst there is a joke to be made about its suitability for her pussy I would hate to inflame things.


It would be rash.


Now that's inanity.

You're clogging up the forum with your unwanted critique of others' posts. Please desist.


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think woodrot's point is that we've had a

> disproportionate number of threads similar to

> this.

>

> Should pet owners should be more responsible? Yes.

> Does the subject warrant the number (and

> intensity) of debates we've had on these pages? No

> way.

I think this thread is not so much about the animals, but the mother and whether or not she should be bowing to her child's every whim.


Forget for a moment that we are talking about animals.


Little girl begged mum for a toy she really wanted, then later begged mum to buy the latest version and sell the old one on ebay. What should mum do?

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're clogging up the forum with your unwanted critique of others' posts. Please desist.

>

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> I think woodrot's point is that we've had a

> disproportionate number of threads similar to this.

> >

> > Should pet owners should be more responsible? Yes.

> > Does the subject warrant the number (and intensity) of debates we've had on these pages No way.



I know who's posts I'd rather read.

Hi everyone!


We're making a documentary about people who'd step over a body in the street but spend their life savings on a cat with a hurty paw. If you'd like to take part please email our production team [email protected]


We can't pay you but everyone who takes part gets a free pouch of Felix.




NB.. I think we probably qualify as the latter, but that doesn't make it any less ridiculous.

Ah I see. People are only allowed an opinion about categories above a certain level - so far we have paedophile celebrities and corpses lying in the street. Can someone enlighten me about what is acceptable in terms of being able to have an opinion.


For example, I assume it is ok to have feeling about mass murder but is a simple mugging disallowed? If not then does it have to involve physical violence? Is it ok to talk about burglary but not about fraud?


The rules here are somewhat unclear.

I'm not sure everyone agrees with you chillaxed.



Chillaxed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're allowed an opinion on anything and

> everything. And you can express that opinion on

> this forum. And other users can rebutt or take

> the p*ss out of your opinion as they see fit.

There are two classes of posters on the Forum - those who are allowed to trawl (or do I mean troll?) all over it with inanities, often at midnight, and the rest of us. The latter group includes tree-huggers, cat/dog owners, buggy-pushers, in other words, your usual ED riff-raff.


Then there's the Drawing Room, which is a sacred space.

Enter at your peril, and do not on any account dare to joke therein.

But that's rather unfortunate, as many of the contributions in there are often more LOL than even Salsaboy's jokes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.assistancedogs.org.uk/information-hub/assistance-dogs-emotional-support-dogs-and-therapy-dogs/   hello   i’d be interested to understand if anyone.has experience of Assistance Dogs especially for autistic children of different ages for emotional support and therapy   There was a prior thread on this topic on EDF 10 hrs ago but it had limited experiences and there was a (claimed) change in UK legislation in 2019. Whilst the industry appears unregulated/unlicensed, there are several providers (approx 15, perhaps more) who claim to have fully trained dogs or say that they can help families to train a puppy/young dog over the 18-24 months.  The latter obviously comes with a need for strong commitment to the challenge. Costs for a fully trained assistance dog are quoted at £13-15k albeit they claim £23k total cost to train the dog. On the one hand, this could potentially be a useful solution for some families if such a dog was truly trained as their websites claim and such a dog was accepted in public places and schools etc… On the other hand, I don’t think that I’ve ever seen an assistance dog of this type or in this context (only for a blind or partially sighted person) and hence a real risk of fraud or exploitation! The SEN challenge for families coupled with limited resources in schools or from local authorities or the NHS as well as the extremely challenging experience of many families with schools offering little or no support or making the situation worse leaves a big risk of lots of different types of fraud and or exploitation in this area.          
    • Hi there  We live on Woodwarde Road backing on to Alleyns Top Field.  Our cat Gigi has gone missing — it’s been about 24 hours now. She is a cream Bengal. Could you please check sheds, garages, or anywhere she might have got stuck please? And if you could keep an eye out or share on any local groups/forums, we’d really appreciate it. Photo attached.   Thanks so much! My name is Jeff on 07956 910068. 
    • Colin.    One for the old school.   Just saying.
    • Signed, and I will share it elsewhere, thank you for posting this. It's got nearly 70,000 signatures at present, and apparently runs till February.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...