Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have no Sky broadband today or yesterday - usually its just very slow (less than 5mb/s) and this has been the pattern across the whole of 2020.


According to Sky the problem is with Openreach and it's a "bundle of users" that have the same problem, which is why I ask. Occasionally someone from Openreach comes out and tinkers at the exchange/box and nothing seems to change significantly - definitely not the internet speed I was promised.


Has anyone had similar problems or has anyone switched to Virgin and if so would they recommend?

I've seen people talking of Virgin outages - is it a regular thing? Sky are threatening me with a termination charge (joke as their service isn't what they promised) but I don't want to swap one rubbish service for another...
Virgin customer service is awful and they?ve been really unreliable this summer. We just switched to Andrews and Arnold, they?re not the cheapest but they are really reliable and have excellent UK based customer support. They also offer to take on problem lines and fix them or they?ll give you money back (https://www.aa.net.uk/broadband/we-will-fix-your-line/), perhaps worth a try.
I would strongly recommend AGAINST switching from Sky to Virgin as, having done it myself, Virgin are by far much worse especially for broadband With low speed and regular outages the norm.. Sky were never this consistently bad...!

You're on the border of the Dulwich and Brixton Openreach exchanges, If your telephone number is 020 7, it's certainly Brixton, 020 8 is Dulwich. If you're using ADSL2+ which is copper broadband, it's going to be slow regardless as copper broadband loses speed the further away you are from the exchange.


If you're on fibre (VDSL), you should be getting faster speeds as they have fibre cabinets which are closer to your home.


For example residents on the East Dulwich Estate have 3MB on copper, but they get over 60MB download using fibre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
    • Isabelle Capitain on 7 Upland Road will be able to do that for you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...