Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the hero worship/messiah thing was MUCH worse last time round,EVERYONE expected him to perform miracles and naturally, he couldn't (who could!) But... there's an overall sense of relief that he got in again that I share and am optimistic as a result.


what shocks me is just how truly abysmal the alternative is, how can someone who clearly cannot think for himself get to become a Presidential candidate anyway. I don't think there was anyone in opposition that I would have trusted. To me, Romney looked like a fake whereas Obama seemed genuine, very happy he has a second chance.


much thanks to londonmix and others on this thread who have greatly helped my understanding of US elections/politics.

Not to sound like IDS but I think Romney gets slightly over caricatured over here. Take him away from trying to lead/manage GOP expectations and I?m sure youd find a much more palatable individual


The bigger problem for the party is where do they go from here. They are correct that America is changing but their relatively narrow, and rapidly ageing voter-base isn?t keen to acknowledge this ? so moderate candidates only get lukewarm backing . Then you have the lunatic element trying to go ever more rightwards ? get one of their people in charge and there will be a lot of noise supporting them but the wider electorate won?t be interested

I agree about Romney. The reason he came across as fake is because at his core he's a progrssive moderate. The win the GOP nomination he had to pretend to be something he's not. Like anyone pretending to be someone they aren't he became a caricature of what he understood these people to be which appeared even more monstruous than a real extreme right winger.


My real concern with him was that his main guiding conviction was to become president. He was willing to say and do whatever it took and was able to go against his 'true' moral convictions for political expendiency. All politicians do this to some extent but he was so extreme it compromised my perception of his ability to lead. A leader will be under huge pressure post election and they need to be able to take a stand despite the political implications.


My family are swing voters (though left leaning progressives so usually vote Democratic). We were discussing Romney this morning and agree the GOP will not be able to win unless they redefine themselves to avoid the lurching from right to centre that occurs between the nomination and the election.

I don't think there's any doubt that Romney is instinctively far more liberal on social issues than even the Republican mainstream, let alone the evangelical right, and his microeconomic approach to jobs and growth was arguably both closer to the US man in the street and more ultimately credible than Obama. On monetary and fiscal policy tho' Romney was a mess, both politically and economically, which gave Obama a comparatively easy ride in the area where he was most vulnerable.


I founbd following the campaign fascinating, particularly in revealing that although it's tempting for many of us to identify with the Democrats as somehow more European, actually US politics is just very very different.

...and yet the land of the free won't let millions of its citizens who want to, play online poker but they can buy a gun fairly easily! I am always intrigued by the US and it's paradoxes but I love it and most yanks I know, probably a small and bias sample, are more courteous, more small l liberal and generally better educated than many Brits I know. Always an irony to me that Brits who go on about ignorant unworldly Americans have such a biased stereotypical view of Americans themselves. god bless America.

"Bookies called it right - PaddyPower paid out last Sunday/Betfair had it 1/4 on on Monday, which backs the view that Betfair is as valid source of likely election results as opinion polls. wisdom of crowds etc."


Some pollsters had a pretty good night, it was the political "experts" and journalists who couldn't call it. Their opinions turned out to be no more use than a toss of a coin.


http://mashable.com/2012/11/07/nate-silver-wins/

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

http://election.princeton.edu/

They were discussing this on this on LBC a few days ago they also mentioned would we ever have a black prime minister my thoughts although you have some rising stars like below. This may not happen for some time America has more of multiracial history then we do.


Chuka Umunna

Adam Afriyie

Shaun Bailey

Kwasi Kwarteng

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
    • How long is a piece of string? AI was a bit rubbish on this one, but Checatrade : average cost to paint a house exterior is around £30 per square metre So depends on the size, access, time to put up scaffolding and cost of hiring and building that, surface preparation, and quality of materials.   Checkatrade put it at £2.5 k for average semi, that sounds a little cheap.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...