Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We've a small leak under the toilet sink which was newly fitted 3 years ago. I'm curious what would have caused it, given the pipework (hosework?) under it is unlikely to have been fiddled with in all this time. It's in a cabinet.


Is it likely to be:

a) Poor workmanship

b) Faulty product

c) Wear and tear

d) Something else


I've asked the guy who fitted it to come and fix it. I'm curious if I should expect him to do it for nothing. What do you think?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/267438-what-causes-a-leak/
Share on other sites

I have a piece of string that I need to measure. Not quite sure how long it is.


I suggest that you get hold of the Readers Digest DIY manual https://www.ebay.co.uk/i/392099477377?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=710-134428-41853-0&mkcid=2&itemid=392099477377&targetid=938486032700&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=9045880&poi=&campaignid=10199638297&mkgroupid=101938342477&rlsatarget=pla-938486032700&abcId=1145987&merchantid=137596852&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIoPLenZ3K7AIVx7TtCh1tCwHYEAQYAiABEgJ8o_D_BwE and have a go at locating the leak and working out how to fix it.


So it could be a soldered joint (copper to copper), but they very rarely fail.


Or a push fit plastic one, they never fail.


Or a compression fitting where you tighten onto a seal. They fail occasionally, and not necessarily straight away.


Or there may be some penetration through the walls, unlikely as you would probably be aware of this.


You may wish to get a female plumber as then there will not be any problems with workmanship.


You could also try Googling as there will be youtube tutorials and the like. And when all this virus is over enrol in a night school class on basic manintenance.

I?d basically act unhappy about it and ask why the unit he fitted is leaking after only 3yrs.

Good luck.

It could be anything, even the seal on the waste fitting (plug hole), not clear from description what?s actually happening.

I?ve had very rare copper (Yorkshire, or end-feed) fitting failures, but it?s all down to who does the work and how well they do it.


Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We've a small leak under the toilet sink which was

> newly fitted 3 years ago. I'm curious what would

> have caused it, given the pipework (hosework?)

> under it is unlikely to have been fiddled with in

> all this time. It's in a cabinet.

>

> Is it likely to be:

> a) Poor workmanship

> b) Faulty product

> c) Wear and tear

> d) Something else

>

> I've asked the guy who fitted it to come and fix

> it. I'm curious if I should expect him to do it

> for nothing. What do you think?

In all probability it is a poor seal around the plug hole ring. See P1.


Suggest.

1. Disassemble pipework and apply a little silicone sealant inside the upper part of the aperture where the plughole ring fits in the basin.

2. Reassemble with PTFE tape around threads at point B.

3. Tighten taking care not to overdo it!


Job done!

Not only do things like toilets, basins, showers start to leak after 3-4 years in my experience but they seem to be purposely built to be difficult to access for DIY (bolts where you need a specific tool to remove rather than anything standard for instance).


for instance, it's easy to buy and should be easy to fit a replacement flush unit - but the bolt to remove the current one is facing the wall and inaccessible.

Reminds me of my first job, we'd talk about this sort of thing all day. I learned so much. It helped that I was in a lab, surrounded by scientists and engineers, with access to workshop and the like. You'd ask about some help from the maintenance people, book it in they'd say. Oh is it a private job? We'll do that lunchtime (cost of a pint). When I started in an office in London I'd try to have similar conversations to be told to 'get a man round'. But even with facilities management being outsourced you can still get a hand from time to time. Of course with the power of the internet there is so so much good guidance on line, although the aforementioned Readers Digest DIY manual is still wonderful.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd expect to pay something, there aren't many

> things you can buy with a 3-year guarantee,

> there's also a good chance the leak is due to

> limescale build-up...


I'm happy to pay whatever if it's justified. I guess I'm a bit wary as we had bath taps which leaked a bit sometime after being fitted, during the same job. These did not look like they were fitted correctly and the plumber's mate came and re-fit them. He said the problem was there was a fault with the taps and wanted to replace them. However, they haven't leaked since and that was over a year ago.


If it's limescale, does it just require some cleaning RD?

I once had a pop-up waste mechanism that snapped inside the plug hole due to limescale build-up, that was after about 10 years though. I don't bother with cleaning the pipes for limescale, but Viakal is good for visible limescale marks i.e. around the plug hole. Some of the Viakal will run down into the waste so I presume it will help to break down any limescale deposits in the pipework, but if you want a proper clean of your waste pipe you may be better with one of the HG products which Dulwich DIY sells, I bought one for blockages, there was a pongy smell coming up the kitchen sink waste every time the washing machine was used, an overnight soak of that cured the problem...

The worst leaks are the ones that effect you but aren't yours to fix :)


I knew a flat roof was horrible for leaks but you'd think someone, somewhere had the ability to fix them, but no they don't. a leak in a flat roof will just return (my mother told me this in 2007 and I laughed)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...