Jump to content

Lordship Lane Carpets

malumbu

By malumbu
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

civilservant

civilservant

Posted
Posted

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Sue, it gives you something else to moan

> about


PaulK, Annette's post was ill-advised - but at least she treats everyone with the same irreverence.

You on the other hand seem to have got into a situation where you're targeting Sue.

Not nice.


BTW I do know Sue, and she does a lot of good work in ED

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Sue, it gives you something else to moan

> about


xxxxxx


Click on my name.


Look at all my posts.


Work out the percentage of my posts which are "moaning" about something - depending on how you define "moaning", of course. Let me know when you've done it. It's probably less than 1% in the years I have been posting on here.


I have looked at yours. Says it all, really.


And thanks, Civil Servant :)

Tarot

Tarot

Posted
Posted

I think the O.P was just pointing out the attitude of the shop assistant ignoring them assuming that they would get a larger sale from someone they thought was more affluent.

This is not unusual with some people in shops in any area, people get labelled and shoved aside while the assistant

indulges in a lot of ass licking,its very"are you being served" type of thing.

Maybe the assistant should have training in customer care. and remember cash is king and serve all types of people.

woodrot

woodrot

Posted
Posted

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do have a sense of humour - which does not

> include this kind of "humour", either about myself

> or anybody else who is named in person.

>

> I strongly object to being the butt of an

> offensive personal comment which also involves a

> local tradesperson.

>

> You should be ashamed of yourself, AC,

> particularly as you have met me off the forum.

>

> And could the people who have quoted it also

> delete that part of their post please, thanks.



Hypocracy Im afraid, after your performance in Cherrytreegate

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I do have a sense of humour - which does not

> > include this kind of "humour", either about

> myself

> > or anybody else who is named in person.

> >

> > I strongly object to being the butt of an

> > offensive personal comment which also involves

> a

> > local tradesperson.

> >

> > You should be ashamed of yourself, AC,

> > particularly as you have met me off the forum.

> >

> > And could the people who have quoted it also

> > delete that part of their post please, thanks.

>

>

> Hypocracy Im afraid, after your performance in

> Cherrytreegate


xxxxxxx


What "performance" exactly?


What "hypocrisy" (sic)?


Are you suggesting that I made offensive personal remarks of a sexual nature about a named person on the Cherry Tree thread?

woodrot

woodrot

Posted
Posted

LOL at dyslexia


You adopted the top hat of ringmaster in that entire sorry car crash of a thread & yet its dial 999 & demanding rendition to Gitmo when a certififed EDF piss taker makes an obviously light hearted dig.


Perspective.


Theres a moral here somewhere, but Im sure you can work it out for yourself.


good luck.

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL at dyslexia

>

> You adopted the top hat of ringmaster in that

> entire sorry car crash of a thread & yet its dial

> 999 & demanding rendition to Gitmo when a

> certififed EDF piss taker makes an obviously light

> hearted dig.

>

> Perspective.

>

> Theres a moral here somewhere, but Im sure you can

> work it out for yourself.

>

> good luck.



xxxxxxx


Thank you for taking it upon yourself to tell me in such a patronising manner how I should post on this forum.


The "obviously lighthearted dig" did not come across in that way to me. I am not anonymous on this forum, plus the so-called "dig" also involved somebody else who was named. I had not been posting on this thread, and there was absolutely no reason to suddenly refer to me, let alone in such an offensive manner.


The Cherry Tree thread concerned a local business who quite demonstrably had mistreated a number of its employees and had faked at least one post. There were many other people posting on it apart from myself, so I'm not clear why you should single me out.


Perhaps you would care to share with us all what the "moral" is, as no, I cannot work it out for myself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Forest Hill Climber
      Are we now under a flight path?

      By Forest Hill Climber · Posted

      In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • DulwichParker
      Local plumber and gas engineer - Jafar - Portrait Plumbing

      By DulwichParker · Posted

      Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • Sue Klein
      Are we now under a flight path?

      By Sue Klein · Posted

      I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
    • Jenijenjen
      The Chapel of Rest

      By Jenijenjen · Posted

      Robert Redford

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...