Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Sue, it gives you something else to moan

> about


PaulK, Annette's post was ill-advised - but at least she treats everyone with the same irreverence.

You on the other hand seem to have got into a situation where you're targeting Sue.

Not nice.


BTW I do know Sue, and she does a lot of good work in ED

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Sue, it gives you something else to moan

> about


xxxxxx


Click on my name.


Look at all my posts.


Work out the percentage of my posts which are "moaning" about something - depending on how you define "moaning", of course. Let me know when you've done it. It's probably less than 1% in the years I have been posting on here.


I have looked at yours. Says it all, really.


And thanks, Civil Servant :)

I think the O.P was just pointing out the attitude of the shop assistant ignoring them assuming that they would get a larger sale from someone they thought was more affluent.

This is not unusual with some people in shops in any area, people get labelled and shoved aside while the assistant

indulges in a lot of ass licking,its very"are you being served" type of thing.

Maybe the assistant should have training in customer care. and remember cash is king and serve all types of people.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do have a sense of humour - which does not

> include this kind of "humour", either about myself

> or anybody else who is named in person.

>

> I strongly object to being the butt of an

> offensive personal comment which also involves a

> local tradesperson.

>

> You should be ashamed of yourself, AC,

> particularly as you have met me off the forum.

>

> And could the people who have quoted it also

> delete that part of their post please, thanks.



Hypocracy Im afraid, after your performance in Cherrytreegate

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I do have a sense of humour - which does not

> > include this kind of "humour", either about

> myself

> > or anybody else who is named in person.

> >

> > I strongly object to being the butt of an

> > offensive personal comment which also involves

> a

> > local tradesperson.

> >

> > You should be ashamed of yourself, AC,

> > particularly as you have met me off the forum.

> >

> > And could the people who have quoted it also

> > delete that part of their post please, thanks.

>

>

> Hypocracy Im afraid, after your performance in

> Cherrytreegate


xxxxxxx


What "performance" exactly?


What "hypocrisy" (sic)?


Are you suggesting that I made offensive personal remarks of a sexual nature about a named person on the Cherry Tree thread?

LOL at dyslexia


You adopted the top hat of ringmaster in that entire sorry car crash of a thread & yet its dial 999 & demanding rendition to Gitmo when a certififed EDF piss taker makes an obviously light hearted dig.


Perspective.


Theres a moral here somewhere, but Im sure you can work it out for yourself.


good luck.

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL at dyslexia

>

> You adopted the top hat of ringmaster in that

> entire sorry car crash of a thread & yet its dial

> 999 & demanding rendition to Gitmo when a

> certififed EDF piss taker makes an obviously light

> hearted dig.

>

> Perspective.

>

> Theres a moral here somewhere, but Im sure you can

> work it out for yourself.

>

> good luck.



xxxxxxx


Thank you for taking it upon yourself to tell me in such a patronising manner how I should post on this forum.


The "obviously lighthearted dig" did not come across in that way to me. I am not anonymous on this forum, plus the so-called "dig" also involved somebody else who was named. I had not been posting on this thread, and there was absolutely no reason to suddenly refer to me, let alone in such an offensive manner.


The Cherry Tree thread concerned a local business who quite demonstrably had mistreated a number of its employees and had faked at least one post. There were many other people posting on it apart from myself, so I'm not clear why you should single me out.


Perhaps you would care to share with us all what the "moral" is, as no, I cannot work it out for myself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There's probably a bigger discussion on why we celebrate Christmas (pagan/religious festival) and why everything has to shut down.  I've enjoyed Xmas days in Spain, Mexico and France where some businesses and restaurants are open, and in a number of non-Christrian countries.  In both sets of occasions it has been festive, but not over the top and the Spanish seem to have a more relaxed attitude in a country where the church is probably more important than the UK.  A Lounge conversation.  I'll no doubt be popping into the Forest Hill Road supermarket on Xmas day for things we have forgotten, with many others in a similar situation who grew up in the Christian faith (I've long since been an atheist).   
    • Would anyone have ends of balls of wool, any colour, to mend an old blanket? Any colour? With thanks Mila
    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...