Lordship Lane Carpets

[civilservant]

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Sue, it gives you something else to moan

> about

PaulK, Annette's post was ill-advised - but at least she treats everyone with the same irreverence.

You on the other hand seem to have got into a situation where you're targeting Sue.

Not nice.

BTW I do know Sue, and she does a lot of good work in ED

[*Bob*]

Incredible.. I step out, catch a bus - and who should be in the van in front?

Why, none other than THE HOLY ONE (*does sign of the Corgi*)

[Sue]

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Sue, it gives you something else to moan

> about

xxxxxx

Click on my name.

Look at all my posts.

Work out the percentage of my posts which are "moaning" about something - depending on how you define "moaning", of course. Let me know when you've done it. It's probably less than 1% in the years I have been posting on here.

I have looked at yours. Says it all, really.

And thanks, Civil Servant :)

[Tarot]

I think the O.P was just pointing out the attitude of the shop assistant ignoring them assuming that they would get a larger sale from someone they thought was more affluent.

This is not unusual with some people in shops in any area, people get labelled and shoved aside while the assistant

indulges in a lot of ass licking,its very"are you being served" type of thing.

Maybe the assistant should have training in customer care. and remember cash is king and serve all types of people.

[woodrot]

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do have a sense of humour - which does not

> include this kind of "humour", either about myself

> or anybody else who is named in person.

>

> I strongly object to being the butt of an

> offensive personal comment which also involves a

> local tradesperson.

>

> You should be ashamed of yourself, AC,

> particularly as you have met me off the forum.

>

> And could the people who have quoted it also

> delete that part of their post please, thanks.

Hypocracy Im afraid, after your performance in Cherrytreegate

[Sue]

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I do have a sense of humour - which does not

> > include this kind of "humour", either about

> myself

> > or anybody else who is named in person.

> >

> > I strongly object to being the butt of an

> > offensive personal comment which also involves

> a

> > local tradesperson.

> >

> > You should be ashamed of yourself, AC,

> > particularly as you have met me off the forum.

> >

> > And could the people who have quoted it also

> > delete that part of their post please, thanks.

>

>

> Hypocracy Im afraid, after your performance in

> Cherrytreegate

xxxxxxx

What "performance" exactly?

What "hypocrisy" (sic)?

Are you suggesting that I made offensive personal remarks of a sexual nature about a named person on the Cherry Tree thread?

[woodrot]

LOL at dyslexia

You adopted the top hat of ringmaster in that entire sorry car crash of a thread & yet its dial 999 & demanding rendition to Gitmo when a certififed EDF piss taker makes an obviously light hearted dig.

Perspective.

Theres a moral here somewhere, but Im sure you can work it out for yourself.

good luck.

[Sue]

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL at dyslexia

>

> You adopted the top hat of ringmaster in that

> entire sorry car crash of a thread & yet its dial

> 999 & demanding rendition to Gitmo when a

> certififed EDF piss taker makes an obviously light

> hearted dig.

>

> Perspective.

>

> Theres a moral here somewhere, but Im sure you can

> work it out for yourself.

>

> good luck.

xxxxxxx

Thank you for taking it upon yourself to tell me in such a patronising manner how I should post on this forum.

The "obviously lighthearted dig" did not come across in that way to me. I am not anonymous on this forum, plus the so-called "dig" also involved somebody else who was named. I had not been posting on this thread, and there was absolutely no reason to suddenly refer to me, let alone in such an offensive manner.

The Cherry Tree thread concerned a local business who quite demonstrably had mistreated a number of its employees and had faked at least one post. There were many other people posting on it apart from myself, so I'm not clear why you should single me out.

Perhaps you would care to share with us all what the "moral" is, as no, I cannot work it out for myself.

[woodrot]

There is a squirrel in my garden, on top of a fence, holding a fallen apple and nomming it.

[Gingerbeer]

NOM