Jump to content

Recommended Posts

OK ,call me stupid but when I go to the link to donate there seem to be several Mark Collins .

I assumed it would be the Greater London one but apparently he's only raised ?10 ,so that can't be right can it ?

Is it the Mark Collins in Norfolk ??


I know I'm outing myself here as an idiot as obviously loads of people have donated succesfully ,but could someone kind talk me through it ?

If you are clicking on the link in Mark's post


http://mobro.co/markfresh


You should be on the correct page. But ignore the Donate button along the very top and click on the Donate to me button underneath the picture of Mark on the top-left(ish)

Thank you Strafer .

Goodness only knows what I was looking at - think I clicked on Donate at the top .

And now it won't take PayPal and I don't have a credit card .

Aaarg ,will try again later ,maybe a temporary glitch .

Circa day 26, he's actually sporting one of the best I've seen. It has a fair bit of thickness and density to it and a shape that's just the right side of "handlebar".


He's done a stonker with ?2833 raised to date. Come on East Dulwich.... let's try to get him over the ?3k mark.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What Firkins were they? The only localish ones I remember were the Phoenix and Firkin and the Fox and Firkin. The Plough has changed its name several times, and then back to the Plough, but to the best of my recollection the Uplands Tavern was named that until it became The Actress, and The Bishop was called something else whose name escapes me (though the smell from the gents lingers in my memory) but I'm pretty sure it wasn't a Firkin?
    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...