Jump to content

Recommended Posts

stingray Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Err. Not a very busy local food outlet in that

> case - a restaurant would normally dump 10/20

> litres every time it changed the oil in each

> fryer.

>

> Also - you don't pay for removal any more as it

> has value as biofuel - guys drive round trying to

> pinch it from each other.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Its true the oil is collected for free and somtimes peaple pay you to take it away.

Pee gets darker if left standing over time.


Also, it looks darker and more opaque when in a decent-sized bottle than in a narrow stream emerging from your body.


That said I wouldn't totally rule out the cooking oil theory. More likely to be someone who does a lot of deep-frying at home than a business, though.

From the previous thread: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,816118,page=7


[p.7]> After a few sips of one of the dark ones I cam confirm it's definitely urine.


[p.8]>Came across council guy clearing up a nest of bottles just near crawthew. Said they were

>definitely piss containers - taxi drivers main suspects. Said council would welcome information

> on any cars seen dumping bottles.

I had no idea there was a section for witches!!!


Interestingly, here's another excerpt from the internet's vast library of Witch Bottle information.


Modern-Witch-Bottles


Very generally speaking, the modern day Witch-bottles are very similar to historical Witch-bottles in their basic structure, even though their intended purpose has changed. The most common purpose for constructing a Witch-bottle today is capturing negative energies targeted at the constructor of the bottle, her family or her home. Even though some bottles are "mirroring" in nature, they aren't normally built to cause agony to the sender of negative energy/caster of curses. Some Witch-bottles are intended to change negative energy into positive one and then release it into the surrounding area. This kind of bottles could be classified as "guard and protect"-bottles.


If the bottles are of the latter variety, we're looking at a (very) local resident.


I blame Harry Potter!


Chillaxed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha ha. There's even some debate about whether the

> post has been made in the right section; very

> EDF.

>

> Conveniently, it is the witch bottle maker who

> decides whether the witch bottle works.

>

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wow, there are weirder forums than this one.

> >

> > I love the quotes and derisory lower caps in

> The

> > "non-wiccan" Witch community. Splitters!!!!

> I'm frankly incredulous that after all this time no-one's actually become exasperated enough to stake it out. :D


> I'd have had the longs lens out and cranked the Canon to 6400 ISO months ago!


Wait for the next batch, dust for fingerprints and photograph. If you find any prints common to many of the bottles, voila.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have no agenda just a simple response expressing my thoughts and experience.  
    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...