Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Burbage Wrote:


> Given the level of interest in the issue, I have

> sacrificed a portion of my afternoon in pursuit of

> enlightenment and am now in the happy position of

> being able to publish the results here for the

> benefit of all. I trust no further clarification

> will be required.


Except that it is wrong.


John K

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ED for me is Dog Kennel Hill North, The Mag south,

> edge of Peckham Rye east and Townley Road West.

> Bellenden is definitely not in ED.



The Mag south? I can understand you not wanting to go as far as The Grove, but surely you have to go at least to The Plough / The Library (where Barry Road starts / ends).

This shows that East Dulwich is within the parish of St. John the Evangelist, but that doesn't end the debate; the neighbouring parish of St. Giles contains Camberwell and Denmark Hill, and they're distinct locales aren't they?



>

> You can see the northern boundary of East Dulwich

> Parish.

>

> You can also see that Bellenden Village (South of

> Choumert Road) was built in East Dulwich.

>

> John K

To end this dispute and proove who is correct, use your feet and read the SE22 on those Road Signs.

Most people have taken the trouble to find out where they live.


Perhaps those saying that a certain place is at a certain point take a picture of the Road Sign in situe and post it here.

tfm33 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This shows that East Dulwich is within the parish

> of St. John the Evangelist, but that doesn't end

> the debate; the neighbouring parish of St. Giles

> contains Camberwell and Denmark Hill, and they're

> distinct locales aren't they?

>


Debate?


Bellenden Village was built on the fields of East Dulwich.


Historic fact.


John K

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To end this dispute and proove who is correct, use

> your feet and read the SE22 on those Road Signs.

> Most people have taken the trouble to find out

> where they live.


SE22 is the area that has its mail processed by Silvester Road.


SE15 is the area that has its mail processed by Highshore Road.


Both designations are first world war inventions.


John K

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That map just shows that it was part of a

> parish

> > (does this parish still exist). I don't think

> that

> > means it's part of the area.

>

>



What do you think it means?

>

> John K



I think it means that in 1877 a parish existed that included Bellenden. I think that that parish no longer exists and that we don't define our areas by parish anymore.


The area now known as Crystal Palace (a big area with it's own train station and park) was once called Penge. Then history happened and it is now Crystal Palace.


Forest Hill was once a forest, on a hill. Things change.


Be proud of the lovely part of Peckham that you live in.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ED for me is Dog Kennel Hill North, The Mag

> south,

> > edge of Peckham Rye east and Townley Road West.

> > Bellenden is definitely not in ED.

>

>

> The Mag south? I can understand you not wanting to

> go as far as The Grove, but surely you have to go

> at least to The Plough / The Library (where Barry

> Road starts / ends).



Ooh no - that bit's ghastly. Might as well be Lewisham!

Isn't the official southern boundary the north side of Wood Vale since that's the Southwark boundary and it's still served by the Dulwich telephone exchange although the postcode is SE23. Having said that, the western end of Wood Vale feels more like Forest Hill and the eastern end feels closer to Honor Oak so who knows.

The issue of this process is irrelavant, as in any emergency the post would be directed to Mount Pleasant.


No mater where it was collected.


SE22 is the area that has its mail processed by Silvester Road.


SE15 is the area that has its mail processed by Highshore Road.

> I think it means that in 1877 a parish existed that included Bellenden


The parish existed before 1877 and before Bellenden was even dreamt of by Victorian property developers.


Would you prefer a map showing the secular boundary?


John K


And as a footnote, you might want to reconsider your histories of Crystal Palace, Penge, and Forest Hill.


An interesting quirk of history is that Penge was once part of Battersea.

The forest hill thing was meant to be a joke. The point is, we live in 2012, and no one except for you would conside Bellenden Road to be part of East Dulwich. It's not even borderline close.


You say that post codes don't count because they came in around WW1. I dread to think what you think about Israel!

Applespider Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't the official southern boundary the north

> side of Wood Vale since that's the Southwark

> boundary and it's still served by the Dulwich

> telephone exchange although the postcode is SE23.

> Having said that, the western end of Wood Vale

> feels more like Forest Hill and the eastern end

> feels closer to Honor Oak so who knows.


This is the current postal district and local authority boundary.


The original East Dulwich boundary ran between Horniman's Museum and the petrol station.


There is a boundary post on One Tree Hill showing the boundary immediately before the current one.


John K

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The forest hill thing was meant to be a joke. The

> point is, we live in 2012, and no one except for

> you would conside Bellenden Road to be part of

> East Dulwich. It's not even borderline close.

>

> You say that post codes don't count because they

> came in around WW1. I dread to think what you

> think about Israel!


Why is it not even borderline close?


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Reeves says she's in charge and no no's Rayners plan, what happens now?
    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...