Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Burbage Wrote:


> Given the level of interest in the issue, I have

> sacrificed a portion of my afternoon in pursuit of

> enlightenment and am now in the happy position of

> being able to publish the results here for the

> benefit of all. I trust no further clarification

> will be required.


Except that it is wrong.


John K

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ED for me is Dog Kennel Hill North, The Mag south,

> edge of Peckham Rye east and Townley Road West.

> Bellenden is definitely not in ED.



The Mag south? I can understand you not wanting to go as far as The Grove, but surely you have to go at least to The Plough / The Library (where Barry Road starts / ends).

This shows that East Dulwich is within the parish of St. John the Evangelist, but that doesn't end the debate; the neighbouring parish of St. Giles contains Camberwell and Denmark Hill, and they're distinct locales aren't they?



>

> You can see the northern boundary of East Dulwich

> Parish.

>

> You can also see that Bellenden Village (South of

> Choumert Road) was built in East Dulwich.

>

> John K

To end this dispute and proove who is correct, use your feet and read the SE22 on those Road Signs.

Most people have taken the trouble to find out where they live.


Perhaps those saying that a certain place is at a certain point take a picture of the Road Sign in situe and post it here.

tfm33 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This shows that East Dulwich is within the parish

> of St. John the Evangelist, but that doesn't end

> the debate; the neighbouring parish of St. Giles

> contains Camberwell and Denmark Hill, and they're

> distinct locales aren't they?

>


Debate?


Bellenden Village was built on the fields of East Dulwich.


Historic fact.


John K

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To end this dispute and proove who is correct, use

> your feet and read the SE22 on those Road Signs.

> Most people have taken the trouble to find out

> where they live.


SE22 is the area that has its mail processed by Silvester Road.


SE15 is the area that has its mail processed by Highshore Road.


Both designations are first world war inventions.


John K

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That map just shows that it was part of a

> parish

> > (does this parish still exist). I don't think

> that

> > means it's part of the area.

>

>



What do you think it means?

>

> John K



I think it means that in 1877 a parish existed that included Bellenden. I think that that parish no longer exists and that we don't define our areas by parish anymore.


The area now known as Crystal Palace (a big area with it's own train station and park) was once called Penge. Then history happened and it is now Crystal Palace.


Forest Hill was once a forest, on a hill. Things change.


Be proud of the lovely part of Peckham that you live in.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ED for me is Dog Kennel Hill North, The Mag

> south,

> > edge of Peckham Rye east and Townley Road West.

> > Bellenden is definitely not in ED.

>

>

> The Mag south? I can understand you not wanting to

> go as far as The Grove, but surely you have to go

> at least to The Plough / The Library (where Barry

> Road starts / ends).



Ooh no - that bit's ghastly. Might as well be Lewisham!

Isn't the official southern boundary the north side of Wood Vale since that's the Southwark boundary and it's still served by the Dulwich telephone exchange although the postcode is SE23. Having said that, the western end of Wood Vale feels more like Forest Hill and the eastern end feels closer to Honor Oak so who knows.

The issue of this process is irrelavant, as in any emergency the post would be directed to Mount Pleasant.


No mater where it was collected.


SE22 is the area that has its mail processed by Silvester Road.


SE15 is the area that has its mail processed by Highshore Road.

> I think it means that in 1877 a parish existed that included Bellenden


The parish existed before 1877 and before Bellenden was even dreamt of by Victorian property developers.


Would you prefer a map showing the secular boundary?


John K


And as a footnote, you might want to reconsider your histories of Crystal Palace, Penge, and Forest Hill.


An interesting quirk of history is that Penge was once part of Battersea.

The forest hill thing was meant to be a joke. The point is, we live in 2012, and no one except for you would conside Bellenden Road to be part of East Dulwich. It's not even borderline close.


You say that post codes don't count because they came in around WW1. I dread to think what you think about Israel!

Applespider Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't the official southern boundary the north

> side of Wood Vale since that's the Southwark

> boundary and it's still served by the Dulwich

> telephone exchange although the postcode is SE23.

> Having said that, the western end of Wood Vale

> feels more like Forest Hill and the eastern end

> feels closer to Honor Oak so who knows.


This is the current postal district and local authority boundary.


The original East Dulwich boundary ran between Horniman's Museum and the petrol station.


There is a boundary post on One Tree Hill showing the boundary immediately before the current one.


John K

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The forest hill thing was meant to be a joke. The

> point is, we live in 2012, and no one except for

> you would conside Bellenden Road to be part of

> East Dulwich. It's not even borderline close.

>

> You say that post codes don't count because they

> came in around WW1. I dread to think what you

> think about Israel!


Why is it not even borderline close?


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A festival-style trolley that will fit in a hatch back. For moving son into halls at uni with a very far away car park!  Thanks    Lottie   
    • Hi, my daughter has a basic electric keyboard she really should clear out of her old room. It's a classic beginners one. Are you interested?  If so, I'll photograph it and find the name.    Lottie 
    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...