Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Scooters, regardless whether e types or not seem to be a very popular choice for both adults and children. Adults scooting away on both pavements and roads - difficult to hear them and in the dark, to see them. (Had one come up on my nearside a few days ago, just as I was about to turn left. He/She totally ignored my indicator - I just saw them in time!)


Years ago my old aunt was knocked down by a young teenager who was riding a bike on the pavement. She fractured her hip and had difficulty walking after that. (She was already disabled having one leg shorter than the other and had to wear built up surgical boots) The youngster sped off whilst witnesses were calling 999.

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> E-scooters create a couple of

> challenges due to the speeds and acceleration and

> their upright riding position creates a centre of

> gravity issue that means they can become unstable

> very quickly.


This is the issue. These scooters come in different sizes with different size wheels etc. The smaller they are, the more unstable they are, the poorer the braking torque etc. The twist and go accelerator is also an issue if it only goes from zero to top speed.


Without enforcement of regulation, the market is being flooded with cheap, smaller e-scooters and it is those that are going to lead to some casualties. Sure, there are casualties with all forms of road use. But that does not mean we should throw safety out of the equation and not have these discussions.

The issue I have is that they are hard to spot.

Riding on pavements and also roads. They don?t follow the traffic light system or have any visibility or light

They are dangerous for the rider but also pedestrians

Was nearly hit by one today

I?m partially sighted and its a nightmare avoiding them when they don?t have high vis on

Trying to navigate the pavements with the leaves is bad enough

I think they're a great way of getting round a city, but it's a matter of figuring out how they fit into our infrastructure. They go a similar speed to bikes, so using in cycle lanes seems sensible - but the network has a long way to go. They're dangerous for pedestrians on the pavements. They're vulnerable on roads, as they're unable to take bumps and potholes (and are unfortunately often ridden recklessly). So at the moment.. it's a bit of a tricky one.
It isn't tricky - people who are breaking the law, uninsured and in danger of falling off and hurting themselves and others must be fined. These are fast machines and those riding them, as far as I have seen, are mainly young and unaware of dangers - if they were they would not be speeding down roads with no helmet, no lights; those doing the same on footpaths with small children hanging onto the handlebars are even more stupid and selfish. I hope the police will take action and be consistent as I don't want anyone close to me - or myself - being injured by someone with no insurance.
In theory I think they?re a good idea. In practice, they?re a nightmare for other road users and pedestrians. I?ve narrowly avoided being knocked down by one a couple of times on the pavement, they come towards you silently and at speed with no warning and not a lot of care taken by the rider.

Also, how on earth do police catch one if they want to enforce the law?


Some of this is down to people being priced out of safer forms of transport, especially for the young. Insurance companies have made driving a pipe dream for the young, unless they have parents who can pay for their insurance or incredibly well paid jobs. So for me, it is more than being about addressing illegal vehicles, but also about asking questions around options for people who want to use the roads, get about inexpensively.

What legal address would you have if knocked down and injured by a scooter being used on the pavement, or for the sake of argument, a cycle being ridden on pavement. Neither rider is likely to have insurance. other than house insurance .


I was reversing my car into my hard standing yesterday - clearly indicating and reverse lights working, and noticed out of the corner of my eye that a adult male cyclist who had been cycling on the pavement, getting very agitated by my actions as though he had right of way!

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You could sue them. They could also get a ticket

> from the police but that doesn't help you.

>

> It doesn't help that most early adopters of these

> things have been kids and dimwits, both groups

> know for acting inconsiderately.


Go into the city, plenty of seemingly bright smart people on them, that?s even with the place near empty. So it looks like these things are here to stay, maybe we find a way to live with them.


They are potentially lethal though, much like living is. Dare I say, they are in some way a little bit thrilling to ride, if you like that sort of thing. And like all of these things; motorcycles, bikes, skateboards, horses even. It?s only when you hit the deck that the thrill of them reminds you of what a tool you?ve been thinking how ?good? you are at riding your chosen death trap.

Yep exactly. Like in the film trainspotting - why do we take heroin, because it is wonderful (more colourful language used). Before we queue up to demonise all e-scooters, perhaps we should have a go on one. Incidentally not fond of them, just being a pragmatist.


Mate has a 30 year old Citroen AX sport thing, goes like the clappers, doesn't stop and in a collision with a modern vehicle would disintegrate.

They are suppose like any form of transports there are idiots with them and considerate drivers..although seems the former is in the majority . I've had close calls as with them as a cyclist, pedestrian and motorist . Doesn't help that uniform of choice seems to be all black with balaclavas it seems . Helmets should be mandatory on them

"They are potentially lethal though, much like living is."


Living is invariably lethal (with one possible exception).


"Before we queue up to demonise all e-scooters, perhaps we should have a go on one."


I regularly ride scooters - electric and manual. It's the small front wheel, poor brakes and hard tyres that makes them a much riskier proposition than bikes.

Which is why I think the answer is partly in addressing design and standardising a few things to maximise safety. A bigger front wheel would be one. Standards on brakes and speed and acceleration could be another. Even handlebar and platform size. Wider handlebars alone make it harder to zip between traffic. Standardisation would also make it easier for police to determine between legal and illegal ones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...