Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"scientists indicate that life probably wont return to normal until April-June 2021, so surely residential building work should be paused until people can return to the office"


Really? And what happens to all the builders, plumbers, carpenters, plasterers, electricians, roofers and bricklayers during this pause? Would you like to see them queuing up at the foodbank, or do you think those working in safer environments than many key workers (ie outside vs schools and shops) should be furloughed for 6 months so that they do not inconvenience your zoom calls?


Am I the only person to find this post unreasonably selfish? When the work starts you will probably find that the noisy phases are for a relatively short period of time and mostly it is reasonably calm.

While I sympathise (I have lived through it multiple times over the last couple of years, next door and next door but one even simultaneously(!)) it is something that can happen at any time and will cause disruption regardless. Who knows how long many people will have to wfh but other things need to continue.


Granted it's more disruptive to you now that you are working from home but some people have either always worked from home or been home off work or with a new baby etc. I had 2 sets of building work, one with each baby (when they were having 2 naps a day) but didn't get the builders to stop at set times or anything - the kids slept through it. Yes it's annoying but what can you do? Once it's done then it's done. I think the noise cancelling headphones might be a good call as suggested above. Also Sue's suggestion re the radio and getting that in the party wall agreement, wish I'd thought of that when we had loud music from nearby builders!

You absolutely must have a party wall surveyor to look at your flat before and after this work is done (assuming you have a party wall with the other flat).


Your neighbour has to pay, and you should not agree to use the same one as your neighbour (I speak from bitter experience).


I wonder if the council did in fact send a letter, because to the best of my knowledge I never got one either.

Actually, your neighbour should be the one pushing for a statement of condition, without a statement of condition there is no proof that a defect wasn't present before the works started and you can press for compensation or repairs.


I know this because my neighbour tried to stiff me for replastering some rooms and redecorating her house because of so called small movement cracks caused by some minor party wall works. The statement of condition had detailed photos on a DVD which proved they were present well before any party wall works started and I told them where to go stick it.


You also have a choice of party wall surveyor and do not have to accept the use of their party wall surveyor, you can have a chat to your neighbour and use this as leverage since some of them are quite expensive...

If the neighbour building is attached to yours or they are digging foundations a certain distance from you (you?ll have to check the distance)a Party Wall Agreement may be in the interests of both parties https://hoa.org.uk/advice/guides-for-homeowners/i-am-improving/party-wall-agreement/

sue, doing party wall works without an agreement in place


my bad, not sure if it's actually illegal and the only way to stop the works without agreement is a potentially expensive injunction:


https://www.peterbarry.co.uk/blog/what-to-do-when-your-neighbour-ignores-the-party-wall-act/



Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> redpost Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's actually illegal and you can get an urgent

> > injunction to stop works.

>

>

> What is illegal?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...