Jump to content

Calling all estate agents


jfish

Recommended Posts

Are you looking for a new challenge?


Do you have a provable talent for sales?


Ever thought about running your own Company but didn't have the capital or patience?


We have a great opportunity for you.


We're looking to recruit for our new East Dulwich office - and we are looking for the very best.


The opportunity is a share of the Company for the person with commensurate experience and ability to drive our business forward in 2013.


Salary will be target related, and for the right individual very very competitive.


PM or call James on 0208 690 7766 / 07855 828 736.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27217-calling-all-estate-agents/
Share on other sites

But we are different, and we aren't taking up any shop space on the lane Simon, which I agree are more useful being retail shops.


We are also offering employment to perhaps a local resident.


If you have such opinions, please voice them on another thread. I believe the term is thread crapping.


Merry Christmas to you too.

jfish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But we are different, and we aren't taking up any shop space on the lane Simon, which I agree are

> more useful being retail shops.


If you're http://www.fishneedwater.com/ does this mean you're going to have just an upstairs office?


"We have decided to get an office. The type that everyone can see, especially when its dark (as it has an illuminated sign). A real office. A high street office. In East Dulwich. Home of perhaps 57 other agents, no less. OK, maybe 17. I haven?t actually counted as that might put the jeepers up me."


"So we?re going to be another boring high street agency, in a high street that already has far too many. But we?re not boring ..." http://blog.fishneedwater.com/.

A Merry Christmas to you too, jfish!


Given that a read of this forum reveals a certain lack of enthusiasm locally for more estate agents, I think a response like mine could have been predicted. In your place, I might have taken the opportunity to defuse the animosity, perhaps with a joke, or better for you, an explanation of what your agency brings that the existing ones lack. It would have been a great advertising opportunity.


'Thread crapping' is a new one on me too, but I do know that across the internet attempts by thread starters to dictate what is posted on their threads are doomed to failure.

I am so fed up of people on this forum berating estate agents - people need to move house and they need estate agents to do it. People who think they can do it on their own are muppets who have no idea of the legal implications of their ignorance.


Instead, I suggest that you should attack the numerous pointless 'gift' shops on and around Lordship Lane selling the same inane rubbish as each other, rather than the people that are trying to providing a service to locals.


And I'm really not interested in all of the inevitable posts that will come from the left wings locals on this forum who have no concept of property law, who feel that they know better and can do a better job than any of the local estate agents - don't bother posting in reply, because I won't rise to your ignorance.

There's a difference between being anti estate agents per se and being weary of the sheer number of them in this area. Any thread on here about things people would like to see in East Dulwicj always throws up a lot of ideas, the community would appreciate a wide range of new enterprises and so of course there's weariness when we end up with yet another estate agent in this saturated market. We want diversity. You'll find a similar reaction to another new Indian restaurant in an already crowded market, unless it offers something different.


While I happen to agree with you about the gift shops (I bow to the wallet of anyone able to do all their Christmas shopping on Lordship Lane), shops provide a service as much as estate agents, and estate agents are there to make money as much as shops. I've recently bought and sold, using estate agents, and there really is no shortage of people to provide this service. They are fighting over a finite number of properties. And as most people will use them once or twice over several years, they bring less to the ongoing community than other resources.


And estate agents are not the experts in property law. That's conveyancing solicitors. I was given wrong information about leases, party walls and planning permission during my searches. I value the role of agents in progressing a sale, and a good one can take a lot of the stress out of the process, but they shouldn't be relied on for legal advice.

merylou Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am so fed up of people on this forum berating

> estate agents - people need to move house and they

> need estate agents to do it. People who think they

> can do it on their own are muppets who have no

> idea of the legal implications of their

> ignorance.

>

> Instead, I suggest that you should attack the

> numerous pointless 'gift' shops on and around

> Lordship Lane selling the same inane rubbish as

> each other, rather than the people that are trying

> to providing a service to locals.

>

> And I'm really not interested in all of the

> inevitable posts that will come from the left

> wings locals on this forum who have no concept of

> property law, who feel that they know better and

> can do a better job than any of the local estate

> agents - don't bother posting in reply, because I

> won't rise to your ignorance.


Please point me to the exams that estate agents need to pass in order to sell property? You say don't bother posting in reply because I won't rise to your ignorance.......that would be because you have nothing to base your statements on. It is possible to sell your own property without an agent and possible to do the conveyancing yourself, although selling a leasehold flat is fraught with difficulty due to lease complexities. Like Simone said, a conveyancer is needed for issues like that if you have no conveyancing/legal experience.

Hello Simonethebeaver


The reason I felt it was wrong for you to comment in the manner you did is because my thread wasn't about gaining business, but rather offering work to the local community. I am fully aware of how most communites feel about having another 'useless' estate agent, and Dulwich resdients are no different from any other local community in this respect.


But as I tried to convey, I am offering employment to ideally a local person, and potentially somebody not currently in employment and this is in my opinion can only be regarded as a good thing. Your comments brought the tone down somewhat.


I also mentioned that we're not on the high street and have taken over a premise formally occupied by a betting office and which was closed for over 12 months, so surely us occuppying this particular unit is better than it being empty? Its 1-2 The Parade, near to the station. I too would rather see all high streets used with retailers who serve the community and in fact help to attract others. I frequent E/Dulwich myself for what it offers though I live 2.7 miles away in Honor Oak Park.


Our business model is different, and I actually didn't choose Dulwich for any reason other than it was a great space available at a reasonable price. Our landlord is the L/A and not charging us private landlord rates. In fact my preference was Forest Hill as I have been resident for 25 years, but what we were offered was lots smaller and lots more in rent!


Previously we were non high street, working from a business unit but we outgrew it and it was cheaper to move to where we are now than increase the size of the unit we were using at the time.


I'm no PR expert EDW, and didn't intend to use a thread to tell anyone about us, I will reserve this for when people actually get in touch. If ever you do you will see that I am pretty straight to deal with and do have a personality that appeals to most.


Ian if you find estate agents boring, then hey, its your perogative. We all have our own opinions. I find most services useless and boring too, except for when I actually need them. Except for gift shops, which I almost always end up buying something that I really didn't need, but felt compelled too.


With regards other comments about selling via agency or selling youself. We actually do a bit of both, which makes us different. I belive you can actually do a pretty good job without needing a full agency service, as long as you get the marketing stretgy right, presention right (exceptional marketing) and get seen in all the right places - something we can facilitae for those not wanting to spend ?xx,xxx on agency fees.


I have no issue with people knowing who we are in any respect, but well observed EDW!


Thread crapping I believe is a term used on other blogs / forum's (I'm sure there is a plural)when somebody starts a thread and another member changes the direction of the thread to the original posters intention.


Thanks for all your comments, even the ones that condemned me.


Best

James

fishneedwater


PS Do please pass on our details if any of you know any agents / good quality sales people looking for work locally.

Hello Simonethebeaver


Thanks for the goodwill. I'm sure we'll find someone.


The term thread crapping is a bit harsh I agree, and there seems room here for a better name.


funnily enough just found it in the Urban Dictionary - http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thread%20crapping


Best


James

I think the point is that it's WRONG! Estate agents are the people who take from you extortionate admin fees, reference check "charges" and all sorts of other highly controversial "fees" so I do not see why this particular group of blood suckers should have some special rates, I would charge them TRIPLE to what the other business pay!!!
  • 2 weeks later...
Well, Paul, if I were a landlord or a house-seller I'd want an agent who was absolutely viperous. Character defect of mine, surely, but 3.5% of several hundred thousand pounds is, erm, a lot of dosh. I'd rather that that dosh go into my pocket than someone else's. Your ripoff, The Viper's demonstration of increased housing demand. Indeed might not jfish applaud you for making this thread a hoarding on which you've placarded his... scaly, cold-blooded, and sharp-toothed charms?
  • 2 weeks later...

macrobana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jfish Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Our business model is different

> >

> > Our landlord is the L/A and not charging us

> private landlord rates.

> >

> Council subsidises estate agent.


Not at all. Why would you think this? The council own lots of commercial properties and their rates are just not extortionate (when compared to those rented privately). I'm sure the many thousands of small private business that are put out of business every year by unjustifiable increases by their 'private' landlords would prefer to pay a more affordable rent.

paulwaw1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the point is that it's WRONG! Estate

> agents are the people who take from you

> extortionate admin fees, reference check "charges"

> and all sorts of other highly controversial "fees"

> so I do not see why this particular group of blood

> suckers should have some special rates, I would

> charge them TRIPLE to what the other business

> pay!!!


And if you rented a property that you owned Paul, would you let to just anyone without wishing to see some background checks had been made to verify their ability to maintain a large commitment?


I do agree though that some charges by some agents are unjustifiably high.


The rates we pay aren't special at all. We paid the same as the previous business did.

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, Paul, if I were a landlord or a house-seller

> I'd want an agent who was absolutely viperous.

> Character defect of mine, surely, but 3.5% of

> several hundred thousand pounds is, erm, a lot of

> dosh. I'd rather that that dosh go into my pocket

> than someone else's. Your ripoff, The Viper's

> demonstration of increased housing demand. Indeed

> might not jfish applaud you for making this thread

> a hoarding on which you've placarded his...

> scaly, cold-blooded, and sharp-toothed charms?


Ha Ha Alex K, I wished I could charge 3.5%.


Unlike what Paul thinks, we actually don't charge questionable 'admin fees' to tenants. Heck we don't even charge a fee to arrange and prepare tenants tenancy agreement (we do it for free). Not too many other agents I know that are reasonable and fair about the charges.


We do charge a reference fee, but that's because Landlords generally don't want to take a punt on a persons ability to pay their rent, and strangely enough if an agent can't prove due diligence when agreeing a contract for a landlord, if it all goes Pete Tong, the agent might find themselves on the wrong end of a lawsuit from a viperous and pretty disgruntled landlord.


Best,


James

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction then pick up the 345 from Falcon Road ( exit Clapham Junction Station from the back entrance) The overground will terminate on platform one anyway so you're already on that side of the station. The 345 bit should take you approximately 30 minutes and the overground from Denmark Hill to CJ approximately 15 minutes. All the best!!
    • I would go to Victoria (185 bus or Southern Rail) then get either a bus from there to Chelsea Town hall (I think it may be the C1 but I'm not sure..I moved from that area over 25 years ago) and the Royal Marsden is a short walk from there. OR get a Underground from Victoria to Sloane square and a Taxi from there to Royal Marsden..It would'nt cost much because its a few mins away..or a bus from Sloane Square to Chelsea Town Hall or Fulham Rd/Sydney St 
    • I don't know how the law works, nor what rules cover what doctors can and can't say in their professional and private (?personal?) capacities,  but on the face of it I agree that some of the comments quoted are unacceptable, to say the least. However, in the context of the subject of this thread,  I think it is important to differentiate between antisemitism ("hostility to or prejudice against Jewish people") and hostility to  the Israeli government's apparent attempted genocide of Palestinian civilians in retribution for the appalling attack on Israeli civilians by Hamas. I might be completely wrong here, and naive, and I am sure someone will correct me if I am, but it seems to me to be as if the English government had started trying to annihilate the whole of the  Irish population because of the IRA bombings in the nineties. I also realise that there is a whole historic background to the Palestine/Israel thing, but I am not familiar with it. Anyway, I and everyone I know who has taken part in any of the recent marches has done so to try to get our government to stop supporting genocide, not because they are antisemitic. And yes there are other awful things going on in the world, and always have been. I can't fight all of them. One of my brothers has taken in three generations of  a Ukrainian family. ETA: Do you really think it is OK to refer to people as "blacks"? Or am I wrong about that as well, and there is some reason why it is acceptable?
    • An abridged version of the article I posted:    The health secretary is preparing to overhaul medical regulators — the General Medical Council (GMC) and Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) — after being appalled by a series of cases in which doctors have escaped disciplinary action. Streeting told The Times: “It is clear that the current medical regulatory system is completely failing to protect Jewish patients and NHS staff.”   Doctors have been let off after spreading antisemitic tropes including claiming that Britain is “controlled by Jewish supremacy”, and claiming the architect of the attack was a “legend”. Some medics have ramped up their activity in the days after the Manchester synagogue attack.   A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “Time and again, doctors who spew antisemitic bile online and in the streets are being allowed to continue practising medicine, as though calls for hatred and violence are compatible with the duty to care for others.”   Doctor who called Jews ‘worse than Nazis’ cleared Dr Rahmeh Aladwan was investigated over her social media posts, including one that stated that Israelis were “worse” than the Nazis and a claim that the “Royal Free Hospital in London is a Jewish supremacy cesspit”. Since escaping suspension by the MPTS, Aladwan has posted incessantly about Jews and Israel.   She suggested the media’s focus on the Manchester synagogue attack was an example of “Jewish supremacism”. The day after the attack Aladwan shared an image of Britain’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, with the words “rabbi genocide” emblazoned on his forehead. On Saturday, she tweeted: “Glory to the Palestinian armed resistance. Death to ‘Israel’.” Aladwan has been a member of the proscribed group Palestine Action, and has shared claims that Streeting is a “Zionist ghoul” funded by “the genocidal ‘Israel’ lobby”. At a rally earlier this year, she said that “Palestinian people who are fighting for liberation, including armed struggle” are “heroes, every single one of them”. “We are proud of our armed resistance and in Islam we call that jihad. That’s an honour. That’s how you defend your people,” she added.   The MPTS ruled that no suspension was necessary, arguing her comments would not “alarm or concern” members of the public.    On Monday night, the CAA announced that it had notified the GMC of its intent to challenge the decision not to impose the condition on Aladwan while she is under investigation. It said that her case was “one of the most egregious examples we have encountered of a regulator failing in its duty to protect the public”.   One of Aladwan’s key supporters is Dr Rehiana Ali, a consultant neurologist who was reinstated by a medical tribunal this year after describing the architect of the October 7 attacks as a “legend”, calling for Israel to be “dismantled”, and claiming that 9/11 was conducted by Mossad.   Ali has made several controversial comments in the wake of the Manchester synagogue terrorist attack, and has claimed that Streeting was an “Israeli puppet”. On October 4, she quoted a post calling for Israel to be abolished and claiming that Hamas had “done nothing to apologise for”, adding: “Agree 100%.” On October 2, about eight hours before the attack, she quoted the same post and said: “Armed resistance is the only solution.”   Ali defended her comments and told The Times that she did not believe in Israel’s right to exist. She said: “It is outrageous that the CAA weaponises an unfortunate incident to continue its defamatory attacks on doctors with a moral conscience for political ends.” Hundreds of complaints over antisemitic doctors Nearly 500 complaints of antisemitism relating to 123 doctors have been submitted to the GMC since the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023. Of these, 84 per cent were closed at the triage stage, according to figures obtained by Jewish News in July. The rare cases where complaints have led to disciplinary action include that of Dr Manoj Sen, an NHS surgeon. Last month he was struck off for making a string of antisemitic social media comments, including referring to a Jewish man as “circumcised vermin”.   The doctor, who was working as a surgeon at Northwick Park Hospital in London, commented on a Facebook post shortly after the October 7 attacks, using the word “untermenschen” — German for subhuman — as well as the phrases “Jewish c***” and “Jew boy”. Sen also referred to the Auschwitz concentration camp along with the German phrase “Die Juden sind unsere Ungluck”, meaning “the Jews are our misfortune”.   Others have escaped serious sanctions after being reported for antisemitism. In February, Dr Kamran Ahmed, a Wolverhampton-based GP, was not struck off but given a formal warning after posting material described by the GMC as “objectively antisemitic and seriously offensive”. This included sharing a post which said: “The Israeli flag is modern-day swastika”. Dr Ellen Kriesels, a consultant paediatrician at Whittington Hospital, remains on the GMC register despite spending months making openly making racist claims. On her X account, Kriesels has claimed that “virtually every Jew has some feelings of supremacy”. The Whittington Health Trust has previously said that it was investigating and that Kriesels was not working.     Jewish doctors ‘are afraid at work’ Jewish doctors have warned that the institutional failures to tackle antisemitism extend to the British Medical Association (BMA). Those attending the BMA’s annual conference in June warned that they “feared for their safety”.    There have been widespread reports of antisemitic incidents in hospitals. In August, the University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust issued an apology over posters claiming “Zionism is Poison”. A Jewish patient who was undergoing major tests at the hospital and felt “angry, distressed and upset” after seeing some of the posters, adding: “I shouldn’t have to remove my Star of David necklace to go to a hospital visit.” Concerns have been raised at at least two NHS trusts about staff wearing pro-Palestine symbols, such as lanyards in the design of a keffiyeh and badges that say “Free Palestine”. I don't have any skin in the game with what's happening in the Middle East (most likely like many on this forum) and I stand by my clearly stated opinion on other threads that neither Hamas, nor Israel, has clean hands.  What I do care about is what happens on British soil and the idea of any ethnic group in this country - with its supposed history of tolerance and inclusion - being afraid for their lives.  There can be little doubt that the rhetoric of many on these marches fuels the killing that we saw last week.  Don't share a platform with anti Semites.  If you care so much about a community being starved, abused, bombed and oppressed, why not march for Ukraine (where we do have skin in the game), or the 150,000 blacks murdered in Sudan as well? It makes no sense to me.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...