Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If ever we needed an indicator how how low the UK has sunk - I suppose artists whoring themselves to the rich & nprivilged is hardly new - its not like the old parasite needs any new art to decorate her homes.maybe she has had the side return extended especially for this crap. I dunno.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2248105/Queen-gifted-97-original-works-Royal-Academy-artists-including-Tracey-Emin-David-Hockney-Grayson-Perry-mark-Diamond-Jubilee.html


You can fill in your own pro monarchy comment below - try to include statements about how the UK is a net benficiary due to the Royals and give me a good ole pasting with COLD HARD FACTS delivered with a sleek confident nonchelance.

Well just to clear up the usual bullshit...


The gifts were given to the Royal Collection which belongs to the nation, and of which the Queen is the trustee, not the owner.


So it wasn't given to a 'patron' woodrot, it was in part given to you, but in your typically abusive response you've thrown it back in their face.


I'm guessing that you'd agree that it's better in public ownership than owned by some rich financier who his it away for private satisfaction.


Incidentally, I'm guessing you may not be familiar with what a patron actually is - but it's not the owner of a work, it's the person or institution that supported the actor to help them to create the work.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really - who would want a gift of a Tracey Emin

> 'piece'?




I have seen marks on used bog roll that shows more composition, balance and innate talent than Emin. She can do no wrong of course, shes a national treasure.A perfect fit for the self pitying compoclaim xfactored Marcusian toss monkeys that ooze from the tailored media we avidly consume . innit.

Surely this kind of thing is just the usual artist PR exercise - to get their 'pictures' in the paper sorta thing (as well as giving the usual "my kid coulda done that" brigade the opportunity to be outraged - it's what the DM does).


To wrench this in another direction and take the title too literally - does anyone else think the crappy linear lighting arrangement on the Trafalgar Sq. Christmas tree (making it look like a pin-striped dildo) spoils the shape and idea of a 'tree' to the point of making the annual gesture pointless (as in it might just as well be a cardboard model of the Gherkin)?

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can fill in your own pro monarchy comment

> below - try to include statements about how the UK

> is a net benficiary due to the Royals and give me

> a good ole pasting with COLD HARD FACTS delivered

> with a sleek confident nonchelance.


With whatever respect you feel due, it is members of the Royal Academy that have decided to hand the Queen their daubs. It really takes very little scrutiny to calculate the probable strength of that organization's republican tendencies, and it would have hardly have been excessively polite of you to have bothered.


If you are genuinely perturbed by the nefarious antics of our constitutional monarchy and its craven cadre of obsequity, I suggest you spend more time with the Express, and less time wasting mine. If you're genuinely shocked that artists prostitute their alleged talents, I suggest you find another planet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...