Jump to content

Sunlit uplands. Are we there yet?


zerkalo

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Sephiroth said:

"You sound like you are Cats stalker or fan boy "

 

nope - just wary. Call it a hangover from my days as a moderator on here

Makes you sound slightly paranoid 😳 

 

DR, any service or website you use obviously leaves a footprint, it is a question of who can see it and what they do with that information that is critical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sephiroth said:

unbelievable  - not only does he pop back up to NOT address a point, he then lies about how often he checks the  forum

"I hadnt checked in on the forum in quite a long time, but had reason to, as am planning a quick trip back later this year...and of course couldn't resist a peek at Sunlit Uplands."

I wonder what "quite a long time" can be defined as? Days? Weeks? Months?

Because dear reader, if we were to take a look at forum IP records I can assure you that Cat is a regular visitor - he just chooses not to post. But mention his name and boom there he is

But yes, there is merit to the argument that there is no-one posting on here which given how much the population loves to grumble about the cost of everything it still collectively won't engage with what it needs to do to start addressing the problems

And I used the Australian trade deal as an example 

Wow...you got me!

Sorry, I didn't think it relevant in my first post in over a year to reference the specific frequency with which I might have accessed the forum. But thankfully,  to keep me honest I've got a fan boy who regular misses me and obviously checks my profile on a regular basis:) 

 

"mentiom his name and boom he is there"...haha..yes, as is the usual custom when someones name is called:)

This is a stunning example of pettiness seph, even for you, and its just spoiling for an arguement. And why I don't miss posting on this forum and many of its toxic discussions. None more so than this one.

Toodle pip!

12 hours ago, Sephiroth said:

 

 

Edited by TheCat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one asked anyone to say how long they had been away - so there was no need to lie 

 

anyway. Yes I appear to be the only one posting about the damage Brexit continues to inflict on the uk 

 

I used the Australia trade deal as an example.  Now if an Australian happens upon it they could reflect on how it’s viewed in their country  and if it has made the change any opinion - but nope. Cheap shots at me a lies.  So very brexit  

 

and as for Spartacus - also avoiding the topic and happier to accuse me of same “fanboy!” Nonsense instead of wondering why supporters of such a toxic project continue to lie    So very U.K. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:

 

and as for Spartacus - also avoiding the topic and happier to accuse me of same “fanboy!” Nonsense instead of wondering why supporters of such a toxic project continue to lie    So very U.K. 

 

 

Hey, don't bring me into the cat fight 😾🙀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another Brexit benefit, for your liver, controls on what we can bring into the country from the EU, from unlimited for booze and fags to, for example, 24 bottles of wine each.  So you if you driving to Calais to get the bubbly for your wedding in a hire van, beware.  Although I'd quite happily allow no fags, successive governments being guilty of not discouraging cheap imports, duty paid, and duty free.  https://www.gov.uk/bringing-goods-into-uk-personal-use/arriving-in-Great-Britain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meanwhile in a country with no money for seemingly anything - here is 24 million spaffed on a Brexit checks shed that's never been used

 

https://news.sky.com/story/portsmouths-new-brexit-border-post-could-be-demolished-without-ever-being-used-13099358

 

I mean the money is clearly important - but it's the total distraction, waste and overhead that's so emblematic

 

Edited by Sephiroth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Bizarre article, blaming failure of Brexit on government and a national pyche rather than the mistake in the first place, believing the lies and  exploiting the fear, by many, of foreigners.  And them makes the trite comment about rejoining.  I suppose a novelty article for the Torygraph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ha ha, some people really don't like an opinion that differs to theirs do they! Bravo One Dulwich - you're magnificently rattling the cages of people who don't want to hear a differing opinion and the fact they get so irate about it is the icing on the cake! Some spend so much emotional energy trying to convince themselves One Dulwich is some shadowy, agitator state-funded lobby group when all they are is a group of local residents giving a voice to the majority of residents impacted by the measures.
    • @Earl, Be assured, it is purely a local group. In fact it is a genteel group of Dulwich area residents, mostly ladies , who are a little  reluctant to publish their individual names as they do not wish to be targets for hostility from internet trolls. Local residents who attended the anti-LTN gatherings in Dulwich would have easily recognised the active members of the group. Should you have any queries about funding, it is quite easy to send them an email.
    • Hi  I have a spare old wheelbarrow that you could have for free. You’d need to come and collect it from Telegraph Hill, so drop me a message if you’re still looking and we can arrange a time best wishes carrie
    • This is quite a serious allegation. What evidence is there of this? Pressured how and by whom? This is quite a spin on ‘it’s been agreed with the emergency services’. They think the vehicles pictured driving through with partially covered plates are the result of ‘poor signage’ 🤔  If it is as they say ‘small numbers’ driving through the square, that doesn’t suggest that the signage is unclear. I mean who honestly believes it’s possible to drive through there without noticing the signs / planters (assuming you’re driving with due care and attention)?! 🤨  Also, haven’t ‘One’ opposed any improvements to the layout / landscaping and signage proposed by Southwark? It’s all a bit desperate. At the height of the LTN ‘controversy’ a number of co-ordinated ‘One’ groups popped up across London. It doesn’t feel like a local grassroots movement, but has all the hallmarks of astroturfing. The lack of transparency about it’s funding / sponsorship and structure does not help with this impression. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...