Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wordsworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Is there something wrong with you?


Either way the answer is still yes, particularly since the eyes heal so well and so quickly!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> lose an eye for protection ?

>

> If just an injection I think something like a

> lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> people still have them every day.


You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment and admin Mr J!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> > lose an eye for protection ?

> >

> > If just an injection I think something like a

> > lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> > people still have them every day.

>

> You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment

> and admin Mr J!


True - but wondered if that was the suggestion of the original post.


Anyway back to watching a few episodes of "Fear the Walking Dead" - how did I get stuck in series four.

niall Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it was revealed that it had to be administered

> through the eyeball to have the required

> protection?



Yes.


I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed, which is not far off according to my optician ....

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....



Fgs

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....


I know a few people who have had this done Sue and have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of days but then shortly after they've behaved as though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it - be more than worth the bother!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > niall Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > it was revealed that it had to be

> administered

> > > through the eyeball to have the required

> > > protection?

> >

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > I'm more squeamish about having cataracts

> removed,

> > which is not far off according to my optician

> ....

>

> I know a few people who have had this done Sue and

> have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of

> days but then shortly after they've behaved as

> though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it -

> be more than worth the bother!



Thanks, it probably won't be for at least a year unless they suddenly get much worse 🙂

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looking to borrow a gazebo for birthday party this Saturday, can you help? Julian - 07961463111
    • Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh oops I've just noticed it isn't. Sorry admin. Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 
    • Two men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four years Good to see these two jailed today for four years. There’s something deeply disturbing about people who destroy trees—any tree. Whether it’s a centuries-old landmark or a sapling in a quiet park, trees are living beings that offer beauty, shade, and life. The men who cut down the Sycamore Gap tree are a stark example of how far some people will go to lash out at something peaceful and meaningful. People who harm nature like this aren’t just destructive—they are often deeply unhappy. It takes a troubled mind to look at a tree and see something to ruin instead of something to protect. Read more here  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...