Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wordsworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Is there something wrong with you?


Either way the answer is still yes, particularly since the eyes heal so well and so quickly!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> lose an eye for protection ?

>

> If just an injection I think something like a

> lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> people still have them every day.


You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment and admin Mr J!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> > lose an eye for protection ?

> >

> > If just an injection I think something like a

> > lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> > people still have them every day.

>

> You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment

> and admin Mr J!


True - but wondered if that was the suggestion of the original post.


Anyway back to watching a few episodes of "Fear the Walking Dead" - how did I get stuck in series four.

niall Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it was revealed that it had to be administered

> through the eyeball to have the required

> protection?



Yes.


I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed, which is not far off according to my optician ....

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....



Fgs

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....


I know a few people who have had this done Sue and have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of days but then shortly after they've behaved as though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it - be more than worth the bother!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > niall Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > it was revealed that it had to be

> administered

> > > through the eyeball to have the required

> > > protection?

> >

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > I'm more squeamish about having cataracts

> removed,

> > which is not far off according to my optician

> ....

>

> I know a few people who have had this done Sue and

> have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of

> days but then shortly after they've behaved as

> though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it -

> be more than worth the bother!



Thanks, it probably won't be for at least a year unless they suddenly get much worse 🙂

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not with all the bins currently stored there.
    • We both own the freehold. They’re in the maisonette and I’m in the flat. They’re older, so with any luck, they’ll be selling soon. Unfortunately, due to recent events, all of this now has to be disclosed on the TA6 form. Honestly, I’d move out of sheer shame if I were them. Poisoning fruit trees planted for children is just cruel, and they haven’t even apologised. I genuinely wonder how they justify this to themselves. Envy is such a toxic and destructive emotion, and sadly, it often explains behaviour like this. I just wanted to say how grateful I am for the support from so many of you, especially at the East Dulwich Forum drinks and for the kind messages on both this forum and the Nextdoor app. It’s genuinely reassuring to know there are still decent, supportive neighbours around.
    • Hmm, you seem to have an agenda.  I like ait of measured that they have done to promote active travel, improving pedestrian and cyclist safety, whilst improving the streetscape. I avoid making sweeping statements about wildlife management as I don't know enough about their policies, and expect some in Southwark are passionate about what they do. Go along to a relevant local meeting and ask, I doubt if you will change a thing by posting here.  
    • It wouldn't surprise me at all.   The council used to spray the pavements all the time b4 lockdown.  They are probably doing it again.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...