Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wordsworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Is there something wrong with you?


Either way the answer is still yes, particularly since the eyes heal so well and so quickly!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> lose an eye for protection ?

>

> If just an injection I think something like a

> lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> people still have them every day.


You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment and admin Mr J!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> > lose an eye for protection ?

> >

> > If just an injection I think something like a

> > lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> > people still have them every day.

>

> You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment

> and admin Mr J!


True - but wondered if that was the suggestion of the original post.


Anyway back to watching a few episodes of "Fear the Walking Dead" - how did I get stuck in series four.

niall Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it was revealed that it had to be administered

> through the eyeball to have the required

> protection?



Yes.


I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed, which is not far off according to my optician ....

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....



Fgs

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....


I know a few people who have had this done Sue and have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of days but then shortly after they've behaved as though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it - be more than worth the bother!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > niall Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > it was revealed that it had to be

> administered

> > > through the eyeball to have the required

> > > protection?

> >

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > I'm more squeamish about having cataracts

> removed,

> > which is not far off according to my optician

> ....

>

> I know a few people who have had this done Sue and

> have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of

> days but then shortly after they've behaved as

> though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it -

> be more than worth the bother!



Thanks, it probably won't be for at least a year unless they suddenly get much worse 🙂

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...