Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wordsworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Is there something wrong with you?


Either way the answer is still yes, particularly since the eyes heal so well and so quickly!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> lose an eye for protection ?

>

> If just an injection I think something like a

> lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> people still have them every day.


You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment and admin Mr J!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does the OP really mean would we be prepared to

> > lose an eye for protection ?

> >

> > If just an injection I think something like a

> > lumbar puncture would be more scary for me but

> > people still have them every day.

>

> You shouldn't lose an eye with the right equipment

> and admin Mr J!


True - but wondered if that was the suggestion of the original post.


Anyway back to watching a few episodes of "Fear the Walking Dead" - how did I get stuck in series four.

niall Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it was revealed that it had to be administered

> through the eyeball to have the required

> protection?



Yes.


I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed, which is not far off according to my optician ....

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....



Fgs

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> niall Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > it was revealed that it had to be administered

> > through the eyeball to have the required

> > protection?

>

>

> Yes.

>

> I'm more squeamish about having cataracts removed,

> which is not far off according to my optician ....


I know a few people who have had this done Sue and have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of days but then shortly after they've behaved as though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it - be more than worth the bother!

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > niall Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > it was revealed that it had to be

> administered

> > > through the eyeball to have the required

> > > protection?

> >

> >

> > Yes.

> >

> > I'm more squeamish about having cataracts

> removed,

> > which is not far off according to my optician

> ....

>

> I know a few people who have had this done Sue and

> have to say it looks pretty gloopy for a couple of

> days but then shortly after they've behaved as

> though a miracle has happened. Good luck with it -

> be more than worth the bother!



Thanks, it probably won't be for at least a year unless they suddenly get much worse 🙂

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...