Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just been looking at https://bepartofresearch.nihr.ac.uk/vaccine-studies/approved-vaccine-studies/ for details of the research project looking at the effects of combining the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines. They're currently looking for volunteer subjects age 50 or over. The London centres involved are UCH and St Georges, Tooting. They want people who haven't had any dose at all yet. They'll be giving two doses, of either the same or different vaccines, at an interval of 4 or 12 weeks. Both those choices will be made randomly, and without informing the subjects of the vaccines used until the end of the study, which lasts a year. More at the above link.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/276409-vaccine-type-combination-study/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I was tempted by it, but then found the understandable bar on those who've already had one jab -- it would presumably clash with their protocol and potentially mess up any randomisation. I thought it would be useful to pass on, to save anyone else from spending too much time before reaching that dead end, and in case it was of use to those in lower priority groups. Though I did leave them to discover that there are also small possible 'costs' involved, like the several follow-up tests.


I'm quite open so far to having a mix-and-match imposed on me whenever the second jab is offered, based on the vagueish preconception that there are benefits in heterogeneity. OTOH, perhaps I've been over-influenced by such as Tim Spector's advice to eat 30 varieties of plant each week. Who knows?

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've just been looking at

> https://bepartofresearch.nihr.ac.uk/vaccine-studie

> s/approved-vaccine-studies/ for details of the

> research project looking at the effects of

> combining the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines.

> They're currently looking for volunteer subjects

> age 50 or over. The London centres involved are

> UCH and St Georges, Tooting. They want people who

> haven't had any dose at all yet. They'll be

> giving two doses, of either the same or different

> vaccines, at an interval of 4 or 12 weeks. Both

> those choices will be made randomly, and without

> informing the subjects of the vaccines used until

> the end of the study, which lasts a year. More at

> the above link.


A vaccine that hasn't been long term tested, One that hasn't been tested against allergies, One that hasn't been tested in pregnant women? One That doesn't stop you from catching the virus? One that doesn't stop you from transmitting the virus? I wonder why anybody would ever think it may actually be a waste of time or even dangerous to those who take it ? Only 45000 Adverse reactions reported so far in the UK so should be fine https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Peckhampam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to Uplandrd2020

>

> For adverse re-action read mild side effects. A

> sore arm and a headache would seem more than

> acceptable.

> "Doesn't stop you from catching the virus" Could

> you quote your proofs.

Most sites say Covid vaccine just reduces Symptoms, https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/center-news/2020/12/covid-19-vaccines-transmission.html

Your site says clearly that the vaccines stop people getting ill but that it is not yet known if they stop transmission. Stopping people getting ill is what we want from a vaccine. If you want to peddle misinformation you seriously will have to do better than this. Up your game uplands.
  • 1 month later...

There's a new second study, COM-COV2 https://comcovstudy.org.uk/participate, which is looking for those aged 50+ who've so far had just one AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccination between 25th January 2021 and 20th March 2021. Participants will be randomly given either the same vaccine or one of the new Novavax or Moderna vaccines. There'll be blood sampling sessions over a ten month period to test your immune response. There are now three London centres. They say "We are enrolling from all ethnicities and would particularly welcome participants from the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) community."


I'm ruled out of this one too, having had both shots.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
    • That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’.        Brexit happened Sue.  Boring graphs!  Calling Nigel Farage a plastic patriot is also very insulting seeing as he and the Reform Party have had a landslide victory all over England.
    • These charity collectors are often classed as chuggers.  It can be scandalous that the charity/admin may keep a huge percentage of your donations and a tiny percentage is  actually given to the charity.   I can not speak for individual collectors - but it common practice.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...