Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting to see that an Olympic Gold medal winner did not know the answer (yesterday's celeb who wants to be a millionaire) and similarly half the audience.


Yet in Northern Ireland 'loyalists' are rioting over the flag not being continually flown over the City Hall.


The answer is easy, well at least I thought.

There are Three crosses in the Union Flag..


St. George's Cross,

the flag of England


http://www.know-britain.com/general/images/st_george_cross.jpg


St. Andrew's Cross,

the flag of Scotland


http://www.know-britain.com/general/images/st_andw_cross.jpg


St. Patrick's Cross,

the flag of Ireland


http://www.know-britain.com/general/images/st_patk_cross.jpg


http://www.know-britain.com/general/union_jack.html


Oh. So the question was Red Crosses. Well never mind cannot win them all


Fox

The contestents were Greg Rutherford, British long jump Gold medal and an older bloke. I am not having a poke at Rutherford, as half the audience got it wrong as well. I just thought that it was something that we all learnt at school - the three crosses of the countries that make up the UK (Wales doesn't count at of course it is a principality).


I thought it was ironic on day that they actually flew the Union flag in Belfast, that so many people in England didn't know what it was all about. Discuss.....


If the Daily Mail had their way they would of course deport all those that got the question wrong. Good think too!

That was a bit *whoosh* malumbu, are you saying it's a good idea that people who can't explain the Union Jack are deported?


I'm quite pleased that our nation doesn't chug on about flags like a bunch of retarded medievalists. It's pathetic.


Half the world speaks Eglish as a primary or functional language, so I can't really imagine that anyone outside of a housing estate bully gang imagines a flag is good for anything.

I hope you will not misconstrue my views as disrespect for your service and your sacrifice Top Banana.


War itself - the acquisition of territory, resources and the subjugation of people through violence and intimidation is an exceptionally medieval pursuit. The flag has a role to play within that context.


I don't believe that the application of military doctrine and practice in civil life could be described as anything other than medieval. It is most likely to be applied by paramilitary organizations, or those with aspirations to achieve power through violence and intimidation.


The UK still retains its 'Cool Britannia' attributes in South East Asia, and the flag design is still worn here by bright young things as a avidly as Brazil shirts used to be worn in London - a symbol of life and energy.


So maybe it does have a use - but that certainly doesn't involve tribal allegiances and a weapon of deportation.

No I was making an obtuse comment on nationality tests, whilst having a dig at a right wing 'black top' tabloid, and trying to bring what I see as ignorance and bigotry in Northern Ireland. Clearly three threads in one.


I liked the good old days when the national anthem was booed at Wembley matches, and fans paraded union flags rather than the flag of St George. Non of this nonsense Sheffield Wednesday brass band playing rule Britannia and God Save the Queen.


And then Billy Bragg really confused me.


Now that is five subjects on one thread.


I need to get myself a bottle of good English Ale. Oh my word my local supermarkets don't sell any. That's another two subjects related to being English, which is way down the list of how I would describe myself. Two more subjects.


But I did know how many red crosses there was in the flag of the Union.

On a related issue, the problem with complaining about the lack of Wesh representation in the Union Flag is that there wasn't a Welsh flag until relatively recently. The cross of St David is in all likelihood a 20th-century invention (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Saint_David) and the "traditional" dragon flag in its current form is also 20th-century (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Wales)... Which is not to say that there isn't an argument for incorporating a Welsh element, but it contradicts the idea that there was some sort of imperialist English conspiracy to exclude a Welsh element. A united Wales as we currently understand it simply didn't exist before its annexation.

"The Union Flag is sometimes known as the Union Jack after its creator, James I of England, James VI of Scots. Jack comes from the Latin for James, Jacobus.


James became King of Scots at one year old when his mother Mary Queen of Scots was deposed by rebel Scottish Lords. James patiently waited another thirty-five years until his aunt, Elizabeth I of England died and he succeeded to the throne of England.


James wanted to unite his two kingdoms but the Parliaments of the two sovereign nations opposed it vigorously. James persistently asked his Parliaments to bring about a plan for union but they continually came up with objections. Meanwhile, James did what he could to effect a unification. Firstly, he declared himself ?King of Great Britain?, a term he created for his new kingdom. James also minted a new coin, which could be used in either England or Scotland. He named it the ?Unite?. It was worth five shillings in Sterling and three pounds in Scots. (The Scottish currency had been greatly devalued during James reign in Scotland).


Most importantly, James created the new flag overlaying the English cross of St George on the Scottish cross of St Andrew to form a new National Flag. He rejected other designs suggested by his advisors on the grounds that they were not ?united?. The Union Flag was augmented in 1801 when Ireland became part of The United Kingdom."



Looks like it was originally created in 1606 when James was king of both England and Scotland and then with Ireland added in 1801 it became the Union Flag we know today. No mention of Wales, and the flag of St Patrick is no longer relevant with most of Ireland no longer being in the Union.


http://www.wardsbookofdays.com/12april.htm

Wales was relegated to a principality by Edward I, just to let the Tafs know their place and stop constatnly trying to rally around Kings (although I imagine the massive castles and murderous oppression were probaby more persuasive in that respect), hence Wales wasn't one of the three Kingdons and not worthy of an emblematic presence.

If the Welsh were to be given a stake in the country's emblem (assuming they'd want one) the Cornish would probably want one too - we could end up with something a lot more colourful...


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT0np91mh8XgwV9Dywns4Yel9UmfENo_lBhgYODdDkICFizm3Nx_w


...now what's the flag for Bermondsey...?

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Union Jack is only the Union Jack when it is

> on a ship. Otherwise its a flag.



This is a recent idea and a common misconception* - the flag was referred to as the Union Jack in the 17thC wherever it was flown.



*like 'tomorrow is the 17th'...

"The term 'Union Jack' possibly dates from Queen Anne's time (r. 1702-14), but its origin is uncertain.


It may come from the 'jack-et' of the English or Scottish soldiers, or from the name of James I who originated the first union in 1603.


Another alternative is that the name may be derived from a proclamation by Charles II that the Union Flag should be flown only by ships of the Royal Navy as a jack, a small flag at the bowsprit; the term 'jack' once meant small"


From the Official Website of the British Monarchy. So, could be either, nobody knows.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm fairly sure everyone engaged with this topic will have received this email yesterday, but just in case... "To whom it may concern, We are reaching out to invite you to our upcoming Residents & Stakeholder Drop In Sessions for Gala 2026. We are hosting two drop-in style sessions (one virtual, and one in person) to facilitate more in depth conversations, allowing us to run through our plans for 2026 and to discuss how we are going to address your feedback. We look forward to meeting you in person or online and discussing our event plans for both Gala and On The Rye Festival in more detail. Evening Session (IN PERSON): Time: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Date: Wednesday 11th February Location: Watson's General Telegraph Lunchtime Session (VIRTUAL MEETING): Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM Date: Friday 13th February We are offering 15 minute slots to speak directly with us in a virtual meeting. Please confirm your availability within this drop in period and we will confirm a time with you. You will then be sent a link directly to join the virtual session. If you would like to attend, please respond with: Your name: Your address: If you will be attending the virtual or in person meeting: Your availability for a meeting time online (if applicable): If you have any access needs so we can accommodate: We really appreciate your feedback and taking the time to attend our engagement meetings. Yours sincerely, Community Team | GALA Festival"
    • Many thanks to the woman who looked after our old deaf Miniature Schnauzer who got separated from us in the park this morning. And thank you to the man who alerted us . My husband is very relieved and grateful. If any one knows who these people are please say thank you as he didn't get their names. 
    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...