Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Lou, I?ve just signed,,as a fellow shed owner, which has been my sanctuary during this last year too . am really moved by your situation, and your strength and resilience coping with some difficult periods in your life,, and what you?ve been doing recently for the community is really to be commended, so stay strong , really hope this can be resolved.

Have you contacted Helen Hayes or Harriet Harman ?

I've signed your petition and I encourage you to continue to challenge the council's decision. I have experienced distressing discretionary decisions from Southwark regarding my own garden, decisions which show no consideration for nature, wildlife or my way of life. I have appealed in the past, thereby taking them to court. I don't know what legal rights you have in your situation, but, despite the fact that they own the land, I'm sure the council are required to act reasonably, For your neighbour to complain about your shed, I assume it's causing him some problem - if so, can you do anything to reduce any nuisance it's causing? Can the council's decision be challenged - have you taken legal advice? Good luck.

Surely it boils down whether this garden included in your lease and you have exclusive access to it or if it is communal land owned by the freeholder that you have access to.


If it is the former then I think permission should not be unreasonably witheld (does your lease state you need permission and did you seek it?)


If it is the latter then you have encroached on land that is not yours. We have access to communal gardens in our block, our freeholder would take a very dim view of residents erecting sheds and other structures in the gardens.


I would also not point to the poor behaviour of other lessees to justify your case. As a director of a freehold company I would take a dim view of that. The whole issue is whether you have acted within your lease and whether your freeholder is being reasinable. That is it.

Lou, i've signed the petition. i too have a shed where i paint and make glass, so know how important it is, and from what i've read , this all seems grossly unfair. i wish you good luck and hope it turns out ok for you, as you obviously are so passionate about this and the health benefits it gives you, surely this is the most important thing, esp at this horrible time we are in

Thanks Sue, RicB , Honoroak Ron , kiera , geebee for your kind support. I am grateful it, and I hope the council will listen to the amassed voices.

With respect Cyclemonkey to the lease, it is actually very vague on whether or not a shed can be erected in the garden. If it is forbidden, then the shed erected by the other L/H would be subject to the same law and yet is allowed to remain unchallenged. What I take a dim view of, and I think many others too, is the uneven application of laws to benefit the wealthy or those in positions of power over those less so. I think the Dominic Cummings case most eloquently showed this revulsion to that process, whereas two socially distancing women were arrested for going for a walk in the countryside. That decision was brought to light by public outcry, deemed to be unreasonable and dropped.

That is why I am enlisting support and why my petition has reached nearly the number of signatures needed for it to be debated in the highest tier of local government. I believe for the Council to act in this way on a discretionary point is unreasonable. I recently had occasion to challenge the Council on their handling of a previous complaint I made which went ignored despite there being illegal activity which massively impacted on our right to quiet enjoyment. After a 2 1/2 year battle the council was deemed to have acted below its standards of care and I was awarded compensation. That is it.

I understand that and it must feel terribly unfair. I was just cautioning against that approach. Your complaint is about the freeholders enforcement of your lease, focus on that. Getting involved in arguements about how they have treated another lessee seems a bit of a distracting cul de sac. I would concentrate on the lease which is your legal agreement with the freeholder and should govern the behaviour of both parties.
Cyclemonkey Thank you for clarifying that. It does come down to a discretionary decision as my RSO said he didn't mind me having a shed, nor where I had positioned it, but only that it was deemed too big. I thought that would be at least a negotiating point.

Lou, based on what you've said in here - I would look at something called the doctrine of legitimate expectations.


Basically it is a legal principle that a local authority should exercise its powers in a consistent way - so not give one person a benefit if it treats others differently in the same situation. It's obviously a bit more complicated than that, and I'm not saying if it is or isn't applicable in your situation, but it may be worth looking at and perhaps incorporating into your submissions, if applicable.

Siduhe Thanks for this. I have to submit by end of play tomorrow, so I will do some research into this. Do you mind my asking are you a lawyer yourself, or have had to resort to this principle in the past? It feels right and proper that there should be an expectation of fairness.

lousmith Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What I take a dim view of, and I think many others too, is the uneven application of laws to benefit the wealthy or those in positions of power over those less so. I think the Dominic Cummings case...


You might be overegging the pudding a bit - it's a disagreement with the council and a neighbour over a fancy shed!


Did you ask for permission before or after you put the shed up?

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lousmith Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What I take a dim view of, and I think many

> others too, is the uneven application of laws to

> benefit the wealthy or those in positions of power

> over those less so. I think the Dominic Cummings

> case...

>

> You might be overegging the pudding a bit - it's a

> disagreement with the council and a neighbour over

> a fancy shed!

>

> Did you ask for permission before or after you put

> the shed up?


On the contrary, in my experience there is a lot of inequitable and inconsistent decision-making by the Council.

EDguy89 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So I guess I'm curious.

>

> Does the freeholder's say outweigh the leaseholder

> in every instance? I rent, and I know I'm not able

> to make changes to the property as its not owned

> by myself. Does the same hold true if you have a

> 100 year lease?

>

> I imagine you wouldn't be able to add an extension

> to the back of the house or anything like that

> since eventually the lease would end and the

> property/land would revert back to the

> freeholder.

>

> I imagine you'd need the freeholder's permission

> for that first. I'd figure the same would be true

> for a building added in the garden. Or is this

> incorrect?


I do believe the freeholder holds the trump card. Was always told never own unless it is freehold, with a lease you are only ever renting the land your property stands on. Also if the leased property is within a block/estate good luck with deep pockets when it comes to major works/ maintenance charges.

we built something similar well within planning guidelines, we even consulted neighbours who's boundary backs onto it who were fine, its mainly used as a quiet place and holds exercise equipment i use to help me with a permanent disability after a serious road accident awhile ago ...and after a year someone (we have no idea who) reported us to the council with allegation we broke planning rules, which we were able to prove we hadn't as we had checked everything before hand... as it only blocks light out in our garden no one elses and doesn't intrude and is no where near any buildings, we are at a lost to think who made the complaint, we have very good relations with our neighbours as well.

Will sign as I know how distressing something like this can be ... good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...