Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well yes exactly, anti-vax conspiracy theories are VERY dangerous and DO lead to people getting sick and dying.


People are scratching their heads over why certain groups are slow to take up vaccines... then you see something like this. If a local church or religious leader is endangering the lives of their congregation, and therefore the wider community, I think it's something we should know about.


Maybe there are even legal implications? Not sure.

Due to some exceedingly dodgy 'trials' in the usa in the 60's and 70's there is an inherant distrust of the medical community in some groups. (google syphiliis trials in usa) It's hard to shake off this legacy and sadly these type of scaremongering reactivate this concern. There is also those bandwagon jumpers who should know better but are spouting off all sorts of nonsense in the interest of self promotion (a certain Mr Fox springs to mind)


apologies for typos

Well, this is it, Chick. It kind of is hilarious... it reads like a parody of all the stupidest Covid and anti-vax conspiracy theories. But also highly worrying if people out there actually believe this nonsense.


I know it is a long shot, but I was hoping that someone might know if a local church/cult/etc were behind this. And also in practical/legal terms, whether anything can be done to shut down this kind of thing.

It doesn't seem to fall into any of the obvious hate-speech categories (no legislation against disliking Masons), nor does it incite violence (just stupidity).


So you have no legal remedy against it, in my view. It turns out lying (except in a court of law, under oath) isn't a crime. Can't think why politicians haven't thought of making it one!


Amended to say that there could be a possible suit for defamation (civil issue) if the Masons bothered. Burden of proof might be problematical however (that's the thing about conspiracy theories, demonstrating that they are in error)

smooch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Due to some exceedingly dodgy 'trials' in the usa

> in the 60's and 70's there is an inherant distrust

> of the medical community in some groups. (google

> syphiliis trials in usa) It's hard to shake off

> this legacy and sadly these type of scaremongering

> reactivate this concern.


This article touches on some of these issues:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56813982


And also things like Windrush damaging the credibility of the government.


So what can be done to fix these problems? It's a tough one. I'd say that better representation of minorities in government would be a good start. Also in the pharmaceutical industry and senior NHS management. Fundamentally comes down to equal access to quality education, I think.


Nevertheless, blatant misinformation and conspiracy theories are a massive problem here...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My main issue is leaves lying on the road, being washed into drain covers then causing flooding risk. 
    • Really don’t  know why people don’t sell their property by them selves…or at least start that way… not difficult if a freehold house, might be  more complicated if leasehold flat but with a good solicitor doing his work, should be fine. With many people using internet, plenty of people put  looking and numerous  other ways to reach target audience. Was a relocation agent for  years both in sales and letting through London and home  counties.. ie acquiring properties for individuals. Same goes for rental/ letting agents.. tenancy agreements are standard, totally agree that various laws governing terms  are updated but nowadays the majority of estate agents in letting and I assume sales  belong to a recognised body so really one can let oneself. Tenancies are free on line or can be purchased for a nominal sum. What do they do for their commission in both instances? Introduce tenant or buyer, in theory check out references and produce a tenancy agreement, agree amendments, sign by both parties, collect deposit and rent. Organise inventory check in and that is it. And then if you decide to pay them for management of property an additional fee in the hope that they will use approve contractors for all repairs in a suitable time frame for tenant. Was a post earlier or towards last year not sure on here or Facebook covering this point and lack of management from agent for months. I hasten to add that not all sales or rental agents behave in this manner but certainly some in good old ED. was definitely a posting about a well known agent in the village who was “slow” concerning the above. From memory, change if staff and just got buried…in my book totally unacceptable excuse. That is why they have managers in each estate agent to overseas and stay abreast of sales and lettings. Can’t pass the buck…and most companies irrespective of type of industry have a leaving policy and hand over policy produced normally by HR..Same could be said for consultants in  new build sales but normally they are  responsible and accountable from start to finish ie monitoring sale  the whole way, have to produce weekly reports to head office  plus  follow up on all enquiries. Been their as well over my career. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...