Jump to content

Dulwich Alliance Facebook page

Metallic
 Share

Recommended Posts

northernmonkey

northernmonkey

Posted
Posted

Perhaps they could use the facebook page to suggest to supporters that they take down the tone deaf posters they produced and handed out?


Dulwich Alliance have finally begrudgingly conceded that 'all roads matter' could cause offence (whilst trying to claim that using the statement wasn't intentional)- but shops such as Fashion Conscience who are core Dulwich Alliance supporters are still displaying the poster in their window, as well as an unbelievable number of houses on Ashbourne Grove!

Metallic

Metallic

Posted
  • Author
Posted

northernmonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps they could use the facebook page to

> suggest to supporters that they take down the tone

> deaf posters they produced and handed out?

>

> Dulwich Alliance have finally begrudgingly

> conceded that 'all roads matter' could cause

> offence (whilst trying to claim that using the

> statement wasn't intentional)- but shops such as

> Fashion Conscience who are core Dulwich Alliance

> supporters are still displaying the poster in

> their window, as well as an unbelievable number of

> houses on Ashbourne Grove!


I was one of the complainers about that phrase but the apology says Rupa Huq MP used it. Anyway I was told there are new ones coming. There are lots up at the Plough shops.

northernmonkey

northernmonkey

Posted
Posted

You know that just cos someone else used it it doesn't make it ok right?


Is it ok to leave up posters with slogans from far right racist groups as long as 'new ones are coming'?


I don't doubt that many people 'didn't think' about it but now its been pointed out its interesting how Dulwich Alliance have dealt with it (ie they haven't really!)

ab29

ab29

Posted
Posted

So-called LTNs and its consequences is a problem here not a slogan which a totally agree with - all streets do matter (only wish the Dulwich labour councillors understood this). It's a smokescreen.



northernmonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You know that just cos someone else used it it

> doesn't make it ok right?

>

> Is it ok to leave up posters with slogans from far

> right racist groups as long as 'new ones are

> coming'?

>

> I don't doubt that many people 'didn't think'

> about it but now its been pointed out its

> interesting how Dulwich Alliance have dealt with

> it (ie they haven't really!)

ab29

ab29

Posted
Posted

I do not see this slogan as offensive - I see LTNs as offensive (damaging) to many people of various backgrounds and yet somehow many of you here failed to acknowledge / understand it.



northernmonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Feel free to keep standing by the slogan if you

> like. Alternatively accept it was ill judged and

> wrong and hope that the replacement poster is less

> offensive?

northernmonkey

northernmonkey

Posted
Posted
This is a discussion about whether a slogan is ill judged and offensive and whether people should be encouraged to remove it. Regardless of whether you find it offensive or not, plenty of people do and therein lies the current issue with it! Haven't even discussed the first part.
Spartacus

Spartacus

Posted
Posted

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another thread to discuss LTNs / opposition to

> LTNs? Really?



Maybe the number of threads reflects how strongly people feel (either way) about the LTNs and how the council are treating residents.

Glemham

Glemham

Posted
Posted

Replying to mfcjoe

If you vote for the Tories you are supporting LTNs because most of the money for them comes from the Department of Transport. Andrew Giiligan was cycling ?Czar? when Johnson was Mayor, and now ensconced in the Cabinet Office is pursuing an even more radical cycling agenda.

Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Another thread to discuss LTNs / opposition to

> > LTNs? Really?

>

>

> Maybe the number of threads reflects how strongly

> people feel (either way) about the LTNs and how

> the council are treating residents.


It's possible to feel strongly about something without constantly starting new threads on the same topic.

legalalien

legalalien

Posted
Posted

Rahrahrah might help if you stop bumping the threads by responding to them?


I know I'm guilty of starting thread number 2 as I thought it would be helpful to have one with just info/ links to resources and not arguments - that lasted a reasonable while... but ultimately you can't control free speech. I accept that.

Rockets

Rockets

Posted
Posted
But Rahx3 the beauty of the forum is that when people stop posting (i.e. the thread runs its's course) then the thread drops down - it's self-policing in it's own way. Lots of the threads, although linked to the same issue, are discussing different elements of it and Admin is good at dealing with those that are truly duplicative.
Rockets

Rockets

Posted
Posted
Maybe it's just reflective of the impact of them in the local area and the fact lots of people have questions and point to raise about them - it is different people starting them each time so not as if some of us usual suspects are creating threads for the sake of it! ;-)
Dogkennelhillbilly

Dogkennelhillbilly

Posted
Posted

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Another thread to discuss LTNs / opposition to

> > LTNs? Really?

>

>

> Maybe the number of threads reflects how strongly

> people feel (either way) about the LTNs and how

> the council are treating residents.


Buzz on this forum (dominated by a few bad tempered cranks*) and Twitter (dominated by bots) bear only a loose relationship with the world. Most people in real life East Dulwich won't even be aware of this forum.


* I certainly count myself as a bad-tempered crank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Ryeman
      Plumber recommendation - Andy Burke

      By Ryeman · Posted

      I would also like to recommend Andy for plumbing. I had a leak under my kitchen tap and he was able to visit and resolve the issue in the same day. Prompt and efficient service and very professional. 
    • Penguin68
      Tessa Jowell centre car park.

      By Penguin68 · Posted

      It's about ensuring it's the medical facilities you are accessing, hence the sign-in actually in Tessa Jowell. And I think there are visual as well as camera checks, after all a number of people drive in and out of the car park to drop patients off. Clearly they are not parked up, so it's not relevant if they are fleetingly on camera. It's only those actually parked who need to identify themselves as patients. 
    • Katherty
      Leaves on East Dulwich streets

      By Katherty · Posted

      Thanks CPR Dave for the link to Southwark's leaf cleaning schedule. Good to see that.   I think that what may have happened was the leaves weren't cleared during the scheduled week for Whateley Road, which was w/c 17 November.  Then they were cleared a couple of weeks ago instead. We have been here through all of autumn,  and there has been a steady build-up of leaves on this stretch since October.  At one point there was a deep layer to wade through. The photos I posted were from 17 December, and as you can see,  the leaves had been trampled and compressed into the ground. It looked a lot worse at times.   Lots of school kids from the primary school walk up and down this pavement.   In case this happens next year,  I have found a contact page about streets https://www.southwark.gov.uk/parking-streets-and-transport/contact-us-about-transport-and-roads - so I could ask them what their plans are.  
    • malumbu
      BYO restaurants

      By malumbu · Posted

      Amrutha is excellent, unless you are died in the wool meat and two veg most will find the food to their taste and it certainly isn't a place that expects you to be a sandal wearing vegan. Recommend Matoon too, there are many great places in SE23, SE4 and SE26 if you get chance to get on a bus. Don't have takeaways very often and would only do this when they employ their own delivery people due to all the issues with the slave labour that is Deliveroo and the like (and numerous other issues).  Yes it is a different thread but I can't stop myself reminding people.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...