Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not in particular, I just don't think it's right that the council can fine you for minor transgression's. I also saw one in Greenwich where a box junction appeared which wasn?t necessary and a camera pointing straight at it. That one was obviously entrapment.

who defines minor? is it you?


or is it people who have to make a decision on how to keep traffic in a global city moving? Where, without fines (or other punishment, you can offer your own?) people left to their own devices will just clog up every road?


If a box junction suddenly appears - how do you decide it isn't necessary? How is it entrapment? You drive along the road, any road and if you see a box junction you don't enter it unless etc etc - how is that in any way entrapment?

There is no revenue! If you don?t break the rules you learned.


I have never paid a penny. How much have you paid?


If it?s nothing them there is no revenue


If it?s lots then you are just a bad driver


When my way is blocked by someone in a junction or parked on double yellows I want them more than fined

A bit literal whoeveritis


I don?t really want them jailed or fined. But whatever ?punishment? is meted out its self inflicted.


Be respectful of other?s space and time, abide by the rules you signed up to when you passed your test and everyone?s a winner. No entrapment. No fines. No jail. No silly threads

a. The cameras there are to enforce the law, some drivers don't obey them

b. Stephiroth is just emphasising the point, I expect. Although for some drivers I'd crush their cars. Maybe the only whay they will learn

c. Do we really need another thread about 'Southwark hating motorists' and

d. If I feel like that why am I even contributing....

I see these regularly on my journeys https://roadsignsdirect.co.uk/tsrgd/reminder-drivers-traffic-enforcement-cameras-are-use-879 but understand that by law they don't need to go up.


Let's face it, we should all know the highway code, speed limits and the like, so not really sure why people are complaining. If some entitled rrrs blocks a box junction or is across the lights, I expect most of us wont have a lot of sympathy if the driver gets caught. My younger me would rant about this sort of thing, and I got done in a 30mph area on a speed trap years ago. Me to copper - it's a duel carriageway, away from houses, in must be 40mph. Copper - no sign, 30mph.


But as said I've grown up since then.


There's an adult conversation about enforcement, warnings vs fines, and the size of fines. Many law abiding motorists think it is unfair that they make a slight mistake, yet know of others who couldn't give a fig, and get away with it. The authorities do not want to demonise decent people. But straying into box junctions? That's just poor driving.

My impression is that when people complain about traffic enforcement being ?just about revenue? what they really mean is that road rules shouldn?t be enforced at all. For instance if the law were changed to have non fine based enforcement say points for every infraction (and driving bans for repeated infractions) I?m sure the refrain would be ?points and bans are too punitive for blocking junctions or using bus lanes?. Perhaps it?s that enforcement is so rare in the UK that the few times people are fined it feels very arbitrary and unfair.


It?s the same with the LTN enforcement the same people are simultaneously claiming:

1. That the hard closures at Calton/Court Lane etc are too broad, stops emergency vehicles and should be a permeable, timed closure enforced by cameras

2. That the permeable, timed closures enforced by cameras elsewhere in Dulwich are simply a moneymaking scam by Southwark and that there should be hard closures to stop people accidentally driving through them


I have to agree with Sephiroth if it?s something that would cause you to fail your driving test (theory or practical) you can?t complain if you get fined or points on your licence.

If faced with a fine, you can always just trot out the excuse that plenty of twa..sorry, 'motorists' believe is an excuse to break every road or parking rule under the sun...."Im just dropping my kids off".....


....apparently it works in all situations...double yellow? No problem.....block a whole lane of traffic while you 'dash-in'?, no problem...Park over a local resident's drive? No problem.... Stop both lanes of traffic while you pull across oncoming traffic to stop on the wrong side of the road? No problem....etc etc


Ok (slightly niche) rant over:)


I say this as a parent of school aged children as well...but the entitlement of some motoring parents at dropoff and pickup is quite breathtaking sometimes.

I see it all over lockdown as well as places open up for takeaways


There I go every weekend, park at the free (after 5pm anyway) , near empty car park about 50 yards away from the pub/restaurant. Then I walk past several cars all parked up on double-yellow lines, blocking traffic on a narrow street


lazy, entitled (and in my experience, aggressive) tossers


is this related to financial penalties? It';s all breaking the Highway Code and if they were fined for this behaviour they wouldn't hold their hands up and say "it's a fair cop guv" - they would just moan about "revenue raising"

I did some safer parking outside school a few years ago, it was an organised parents' campaign to dissuade inappropriate parking, for about a week. We got a bit of grief early on and then those particular parents stopped parking irresponsibly. It was a gentle reminder and a leaflet rather than anything more confrontational. After day two or three, some would come up to their usual irresponsible parking space, and then look embarrassed and drive away.


It was a sizeable minority if that makes sense. Of course once our kids had moved on the same problem happened all over again.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sorry - what's the problem here?

>

> You want to enter box junctions, park on double

> yellow lines?


-------------------------------------------------------

> People who leave litter and drive badly

>

> Fine them both to hell. Jail Em

>

> Just make them stop


I didn?t advocate parking on double yellow lines. I didn?t advocate entering a box junction when your exit is blocked and I certainly don?t drop litter and am a careful and courteous driver. I think copping a ?65.00 fine for straying into the bus lane on the way to Sainsbury on DKH is unreasonable, a written warning for a first offence would be reasonable. You are unnecessarily aggressive. I wonder if you be so aggressive face to face? You are a keyboard bully.

Chick. You?ve met me several times. If it was about this subject it?s possible i would be


Written warnings etc sound reasonable but


A) sheer volume of people doing this means it would be massively costly

B) most likely ineffective


I can agree that accidentally straying into a bus lane can seem overly harsh - but that?s at an individual level. At a city wide level it?s happening all the time


And lastly, you didn?t start a thread asking if 65 Quid was a bit harsh for accidentally slipping into a bus lane. You said council are putting up cameras as nothing more than a cash grab. You say you aren?t advocating breaking the rules but it?s happening by the minute. That?s the real issue


If it was ONLy An accidental and occasional driver doing a whoopsie there wouldn?t be a problem and there wouldn?t need to be such strict penalties. But we are where we are

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...