Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am wondering if anyone knows the exact plans for increasing the ED Charter year 7 intake. We would be slightly outside the catchment if we were applying this year. But I understand there are plans to increase intake from 180 to 240. The website says 210 from September 2022. Would they then extend to 240 in 2023 or is that still to be decided? All intel welcome! Thank you
The demand for secondary places is going to decrease over the next few years, some primaries are starting to be undersubscribed, so even without the expansion the catchment will increase. It is the last couple of year and the next year where the extra places would have been most needed and the original plan was to provide for these extraordinary bulge years. Unfortunately the delays meant that the catchment to East Dulwich has been, and is, minuscule. It will get bigger soon even without the extra places.

There are several hundred primary school places where the nearest secondary school is Charter ED. I believe Charter ED is 93% over subscribed. So the catchment isn?t expanding anytime soon , in fact, realistically, ever. There may be more places added to the intake imminently but the sibling places will increasingly kick in to counteract that.

It?s true that by year 6 primary classes are not full due to people moving away or moving their kids to private school in years 4/5/6, but the number of charter ED places will still be far far less than the number of children applying. Year 6 classes at primary schools have never been full, it?s not a new development.

I wish this was the case. I think primary schools are getting unsubscribed in Dulwich as there are 3 new primary schools that opened in the last few years: The Belham, Harris Primary School, Judith Kerr. Not sure if there are more. I think there are more primary school places around Dulwich for the number of secondary school places. I think we are still short of state secondary school places sadly.





RoundTable Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The demand for secondary places is going to

> decrease over the next few years, some primaries

> are starting to be undersubscribed, so even

> without the expansion the catchment will increase.

> It is the last couple of year and the next year

> where the extra places would have been most needed

> and the original plan was to provide for these

> extraordinary bulge years. Unfortunately the

> delays meant that the catchment to East Dulwich

> has been, and is, minuscule. It will get bigger

> soon even without the extra places.

I'm starting to see Southwark schools advertising nursery and reception places. Lyndhurst and Dog Kennel Hill are advertising they have nursery places left. 11 years ago, when my son was born, you had to fight to the death for a nursery place at either place.
Yup, people who have moved into the area have stayed in the area. Therefore, fewer homes are coming on the market and so there are fewer younger families. Several schools in this area are no longer able to fill their reception places and at some point, I think we will see some schools close or have their intake reduced - eg from two form to one form intake. This makes expanding secondary schools less attractive in the long-term.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...