Jump to content

Recommended Posts

creditwheredue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?6.30 for Camden Hells, ?5.50 in the park.



I paid over 6 for Camden hells in the Chelsea Potter (Kings Road) - first pub I went to in a year - but the staff were so out of practice they added my bill to my mates card (I apologised the next day).


i suspect 6 is the new 5.

Went for a walk in Bermondsey and onto Rotherhithe yesterday, near Tower Bridge 7 is the new 6, and even in a Sam Smiths pub two halves of cider and a bottle of beer was over ?12 (no draught or fizzy beer on tap). Obviously Bermondsey proper is cheaper.


Although you have refuges like the Blythe and the Hope in West Norwood (hasn't done what the rest of Young's Estate has done) Where you will get plenty of changer out of a tenner for two pints. And there is always Tim Brexiteer's places.

They've put their prices up as pubs have to make up for lost trade. Bitter is still hovering around the ?4 mark, but they have the IPAs and the like which will be much higher. They tried to keep Guinness down to below four quid for yonks but will have passed that by now. I don't drink lager, but the farmhouse cider remains decent in terms of cost and price.


Another fave is the Ivy but their prices are well above the Blythe and not the same quality - I do tell them!


I see that Tim Brexiteer wants to bring European bar staff in on a special working visa. That takes the biscuit, but is for another thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...