Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The only topic being "This is a test forum. Feel free to delete it or edit after installation." may be something of a give away.


Besides, you only need look at the west dulwich forum to see just how hard it is to hit the necessary user/network critical mass to make something online work. No disrespect to Downsouth, it's 10% hard work, 90% luck.

http://www.westdulwichforum.co.uk/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2861-nunhead-forum/#findComment-88276
Share on other sites

vivienne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very impressed by the East Dulwich Forum I

> wondered whether there was one for Nunhead. It

> appears there is, and yet when I try to register

> it says that it is unknown and doesn't exist. any

> wisdom from ED?


Vivienne!


What are you trying to do to Nunhead (I mean Nunhead South, I realise the Nunhead Lane bit has already tried to clone ED).


Nunhead Forum? Discuss the Waverley Arms. Discuss the Stuart Arms. Can anyone recommend the best place to find a dodgy bloke to burn out your car on Peckham Rye? Which mini-mart has got the most heavily processed white bread today? Is anyone looking to share a social worker? Our lovely social worker is having a nervous breakdown in April and we just don't know who is going to monitor little Ashley's asbo. Did you see my scratchcard man? I dropped my scratchcard, I think my scratchcard won. Have you seen my staffy? We think the bloke next door might have stoled him but my partner is in a drug induced coma in the garden and I'm not going over there on my own.


Nunhead Forum. Really. Nunhead will never need a forum. If people in Nunhead want to have strange dysfunctional conversations, we do not need cyberspace, we can do that at home or with the neighbours.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2861-nunhead-forum/#findComment-88330
Share on other sites

This is the Nunhead forum - unless you have erected an organic digitally formed fence around this web address ?


Ps the Thai resturant Skehans which is technically New Cross - but really Nunhead in a sense of proximity is an absolute cracker. As good as the Thai Corner which we all know is great, but the actual restuarant part at the back of the Pub has a really great vibe - I thoroughly recommend it.


I have spoken to the locals and told them to watch out for badly dressed people, wearing clothes from the white stuff and crocs so you guys should all be safe. This freedom pass only lasts till MAY.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2861-nunhead-forum/#findComment-88890
Share on other sites

Snoozequeen1 are you serious?

Want me to persuade you of the crap of which you speaketh?



snoozequeen1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Vivienne!

>

> What are you trying to do to Nunhead (I mean

> Nunhead South, I realise the Nunhead Lane bit has

> already tried to clone ED).

>

> Nunhead Forum? Discuss the Waverley Arms.

> Discuss the Stuart Arms. Can anyone recommend the

> best place to find a dodgy bloke to burn out your

> car on Peckham Rye? Which mini-mart has got the

> most heavily processed white bread today? Is

> anyone looking to share a social worker? Our

> lovely social worker is having a nervous breakdown

> in April and we just don't know who is going to

> monitor little Ashley's asbo. Did you see my

> scratchcard man? I dropped my scratchcard, I

> think my scratchcard won. Have you seen my staffy?

> We think the bloke next door might have stoled him

> but my partner is in a drug induced coma in the

> garden and I'm not going over there on my own.

>

> Nunhead Forum. Really. Nunhead will never need a

> forum. If people in Nunhead want to have strange

> dysfunctional conversations, we do not need

> cyberspace, we can do that at home or with the

> neighbours.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2861-nunhead-forum/#findComment-88942
Share on other sites

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Snoozequeen1 are you serious?

> Want me to persuade you of the crap of which you

> speaketh?

>

>PR, what language! are you a Nunhead girl? I rest my case.


Though I grant you, one of the mini-marts has started trying to sell veg that's not baked beans and not in tins. But I don't think they realised they had to provide an identification chart for anything that doesn't say "Heinz" on it.


The last thing we need around here is gentrification. Even with all the halfway houses and hostels Southwark Council used to automatically plonk in Camberwell we still have peace and quiet. Apart from the people who live on Harlescott Road and keep their curtains open and the lights on full beam 24/7 to show off the decorating, there are absolutely no pretentious people living here. Everybody either does a) a proper job or is b) a proper, old fashioned criminal. Isn't it lovely? No students. No hoards of actors or stylists or people in advertising or lifestyle coaches or management consultants. Only one barrister and I think he works for the Crown Prosecution Service. Not a single estate agent.


FOR GOD'S SAKE, SHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2861-nunhead-forum/#findComment-88994
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...