Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you get a chance listen to the two callers to Stephen Nolan's show Saturday night.

Starts at 1:46 in. English fans in Danish section for Denmark game. Awful, awful behaviour - second caller alleges that English "fan" threatened her 9 year old daughter. Makes me so ashamed.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000xtx1

https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/police-record-incidents-football-england-euros-final-b945388.html


'The national footballing police lead has criticised the ?the violent and frightening behaviour of a sizeable minority? after forces across the country dealt with a record number of football-related incidents following last night?s Euro 2020 final.'

Well it's not a few louts then, far many. Better discussion on the zero tolerance thread, but think it is worth adding that as a nation we encourage excess drinking. I should know, I was p.ssed for much of my late teens and twenties. Not big or clever, but despite numerous embarrassing incidents, I never got into any situations like we saw on Sunday.

notimpressed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Poor middle class rich people who managed to get

> tickets because real Danish football fans couldnt

> travel, who were then confronted by normal rowdy

> working class football fans.

>

> They probably thought they were off to be

> pleasantly entertained like an evening at the

> theatre. Sounds like they found out that football

> is a boisterous sport both on and off the pitch,

> couldn't handle it, and went crying to the media.

>

> No sympathy at all- stick to Wimbledon.


0/10


But i will pick up on one thing....Football is not a boisterous sport at all. It's actually a rather dull, sedate sport....89 minutes of passing to each other for 1min of actually shots on goal/action....its no wonder you have to be rip-roaring drunk to get through it.

notimpressed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > notimpressed Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Poor middle class rich people who managed to

> > get

> > > tickets because real Danish football fans

> > couldnt

> > > travel, who were then confronted by normal

> > rowdy

> > > working class football fans.

> > >

> > > They probably thought they were off to be

> > > pleasantly entertained like an evening at the

> > > theatre. Sounds like they found out that

> > football

> > > is a boisterous sport both on and off the

> > pitch,

> > > couldn't handle it, and went crying to the

> > media.

> > >

> > > No sympathy at all- stick to Wimbledon.

> >

> > 0/10

> >

> > But i will pick up on one thing....Football is

> not

> > a boisterous sport at all. It's actually a

> rather

> > dull, sedate sport....89 minutes of passing to

> > each other for 1min of actually shots on

> > goal/action....its no wonder you have to be

> > rip-roaring drunk to get through it.

>

>

> Jog on mate- your probably a rugby fan, where they

> all sit together and discuss each others skiing

> trips. Please stick to it and do not try and come

> to football matches.



I am a Rugby fan, but on the chat, you're not even close mate...we discuss HELI-Skiing...very different from a normal ski trip....much more exclusive...not a pleb in sight.


Also...it's spelt 'you're'

notimpressed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jog on mate- your probably a rugby fan, where they

> all sit together and discuss each others skiing

> trips. Please stick to it and do not try and come

> to football matches.


Actually one of my favourite English rugby players/political commentators seems to have gone missing on twitter - hope he's back soon as I like his posts :)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> notimpressed Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jog on mate- your probably a rugby fan, where

> they

> > all sit together and discuss each others skiing

> > trips. Please stick to it and do not try and

> come

> > to football matches.

>

> Actually one of my favourite English rugby

> players/political commentators seems to have gone

> missing on twitter - hope he's back soon as I like

> his posts :)


Brian Moore?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > notimpressed Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Jog on mate- your probably a rugby fan, where

> > they

> > > all sit together and discuss each others

> skiing

> > > trips. Please stick to it and do not try and

> > come

> > > to football matches.

> >

> > Actually one of my favourite English rugby

> > players/political commentators seems to have

> gone

> > missing on twitter - hope he's back soon as I

> like

> > his posts :)

>

> Brian Moore?


Yes - suspect a short ban on posting for something he said about a tory activist (I maybe wrong) :)


Hope to hear more commentating from him too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...