Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wonder where people will park when they drive there using EDG and Grove Vale access? Actually I don?t mind a street market on Melbourne all weekend, great for traders and lots of hot food stalls please. I can see Korean BBQs and one of those cheese toasty sandwich stalls like the one in Borough....mmmmhhhhh tasty but terrible for my waistline.

northernmonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its planned to be at the Grove Vale end of

> Melbourne Grove - by the shops there. So the

> cherry tree would be the closest pub.


In that case, Derwent Grove and Elsie Road are going to see even more 3 point turns that they have now.

fottos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> northernmonkey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Its planned to be at the Grove Vale end of

> > Melbourne Grove - by the shops there. So the

> > cherry tree would be the closest pub.

>

> In that case, Derwent Grove and Elsie Road are

> going to see even more 3 point turns that they

> have now.


They should pay attention to signage then.

I think we have saturation point on hipster street markets/street food


Why anyone would pay ?7 for some street food and then having to find somewhere to perch down uncomfortably and eat it, when there are cheaper cafes with table service (and a toilet!!) is beyond me

How does a street market work in a street which is predominantly residential?


Surely residents need to park their cars there and may need to drive out/in on market day.


North Cross doesnt have that problem as it's got shops all the way along one side from LL to Fellbrig Rd.

Sounds like a cynical attempt by Southwark to pretend it hasn't ruined the businesses in the area.

ED just isn't big enough to support two street markets. If they open one, there'll be a few takers at first, then it'll tail off and Southwark can pretend it was really really trying to help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...