Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Here on the Forum we're not judge or jury or have the time to consider evidence in defamatory claims made against each user. Now as a previous post has become personal and legal action has been mentioned we're asking people to be careful, so I recommend that replies regarding the above posts from the concerned parties are withheld even though they're probably going to be really juicy and fun. We're toying with the idea of removing the post, but then we'll might have to remove the whole thread, and then where do we stop? As MC Hammer would have said if his name was MC Dilemma, "it's Dilemma Time!"

We will continue to ponder and discuss with our moral councillors.


I would also like to point out, as it's been mentioned before, the fundamental distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If the offending material is published in some fleeting form, as by spoken words or sounds, sign language, gestures and the like, then this is slander. If it is published in more durable form, for example in written words, film, compact disc and the like, then it is considered libel.

how exciting!



An interesting perspective on defamtion is the effect - i.e. that it sullies or causes problems for the "defamed" persons reputation - hence mr Archer will be unlikely to bring any slander / libel cases against anyone in the future, as he is "marked" already and his reputation is besmirched anyway.


so if you have bad rep anyway, it poitless thinking about action.




I cant wait for the next episode of this drama ! it beats watching reruns of The Rockford files on Freeview !

I called panther cars from sainsburys recently, I was told a cab would arrive in ten minutes - 20 mins later i was still waiting around for a cab. So I decided to call them back and find out why it was taking so long, I received nothing but rudeness and verbal abuse from the operator. I called a another cab number that I just so happend to find in my handbag, I was told a car would arrive within 5 mins, and guess what? a car did arrive within 5 mins. The driver even got out and helped me load my shopping into the boot which made a nice change, the driver was so sweet and friendly (not bad looking either) we got chatting and he told me that he works for a new cab station based at the end of Barry road called Capital Carries. I've been using them ever since and I'll definitely be using them in the future. I highly recommend them, give them a try some time - I think you'll find the service overall is the best in Dulwich.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...