Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Boundary Commission for England (www.bcereviews.org.uk is proposing changes to redraw parliamentary constituencies across the country. There are major changes for Camberwell voters with the Commission recommending approx. a third of Camberwell joins Vauxhall to become ?Vauxhall and Camberwell?, and nearly two-thirds of Camberwell being absorbed into Peckham.

We already have a situation with no single MP exclusively focused on Camberwell, with areas represented around the SE5 borders by three other MPs and the majority of residents sitting in ?Camberwell and Peckham?. If this proposal goes ahead, when the next General Election comes, our interests as a community will now be severely divided. The risk is that investment, for jobs, for transport and other benefits will be increasingly diverted to town centres of Vauxhall, Brixton, and Peckham, and we will be overlooked.

Our response

The SE5 Forum for Camberwell, The Camberwell Society, Camberwell Arts and the Camberwell Identity Group believe that this breakup of the Camberwell community is unacceptable. For example, this proposal will see the Camberwell School of Arts, King?s College Hospital, Camberwell Grove, Camberwell Grove, Camberwell New Rd, Denmark Hill Station and Burgess Park become part of Peckham.

This is yet another example of how Camberwell?s identity is being eroded in subtle but additive ways. We already lie on the boundary between councils and, as a result, often lose out on funding opportunities.

We understand this process is important to even up the numbers of each constituency. But we know how important the recognition of home as a place is. That ?sense of place? influences us in many ways as an individual, and as a member of a community. Camberwell is home to over 40,000 people with thousands more employed, studying and visiting. It is a real neighbourhood. We have a strong cultural mix, and rich history, which makes it a great place to live. We are proud to call our home Camberwell.

The Boundary Commission has an obligation to recognise communities and try and keep them together. We will submit a response to the Boundary Commission proposal on the 2nd August 21. We will be asking that it reconsiders the current proposal and recognises Camberwell, as defined by the postcode SE5, as a community.

Call to action

If you feel the same, then please sign our petition, so together we can ask the Commission to ensure we keep Camberwell together.

LINKS

https://www.change.org/p/boundary-commission-for-england-keep-camberwell-together-se5


or short form


http://chng.it/wdHV57b5sh

I'm sorry, but the local government for the old borough of Camberwell will remain under Southwark (whether we like it or not). The impact of this Parliamentary Constituency boundary change is broadly irrelevant to local Camberwell issues, save that in future there may be 2 MPs who can be called upon to raise issues at a Parliamentary/ Ministerial level and not one.


There may be reasons to challenge the proposals, but further damage to Camberwell local government is not one. It will remain unchanged. Camberwell will stay in Southwark, in its entirety, and Southwark will continue not to listen to 'South Southwark' issues.

hellose5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Boundary Commission for England

> (www.bcereviews.org.uk is proposing changes to

> redraw parliamentary constituencies across the

> country. There are major changes for Camberwell

> voters with the Commission recommending approx. a

> third of Camberwell joins Vauxhall to become

> ?Vauxhall and Camberwell?, and nearly two-thirds

> of Camberwell being absorbed into Peckham.

> We already have a situation with no single MP

> exclusively focused on Camberwell, with areas

> represented around the SE5 borders by three other

> MPs and the majority of residents sitting in

> ?Camberwell and Peckham?. If this proposal goes

> ahead, when the next General Election comes, our

> interests as a community will now be severely

> divided. The risk is that investment, for jobs,

> for transport and other benefits will be

> increasingly diverted to town centres of Vauxhall,

> Brixton, and Peckham, and we will be overlooked.

> Our response

> The SE5 Forum for Camberwell, The Camberwell

> Society, Camberwell Arts and the Camberwell

> Identity Group believe that this breakup of the

> Camberwell community is unacceptable. For example,

> this proposal will see the Camberwell School of

> Arts, King?s College Hospital, Camberwell Grove,

> Camberwell Grove, Camberwell New Rd, Denmark Hill

> Station and Burgess Park become part of Peckham.

> This is yet another example of how Camberwell?s

> identity is being eroded in subtle but additive

> ways. We already lie on the boundary between

> councils and, as a result, often lose out on

> funding opportunities.

> We understand this process is important to even up

> the numbers of each constituency. But we know how

> important the recognition of home as a place is.

> That ?sense of place? influences us in many ways

> as an individual, and as a member of a community.

> Camberwell is home to over 40,000 people with

> thousands more employed, studying and visiting. It

> is a real neighbourhood. We have a strong cultural

> mix, and rich history, which makes it a great

> place to live. We are proud to call our home

> Camberwell.

> The Boundary Commission has an obligation to

> recognise communities and try and keep them

> together. We will submit a response to the

> Boundary Commission proposal on the 2nd August 21.

> We will be asking that it reconsiders the current

> proposal and recognises Camberwell, as defined by

> the postcode SE5, as a community.

> Call to action

> If you feel the same, then please sign our

> petition, so together we can ask the Commission to

> ensure we keep Camberwell together.

> LINKS

> https://www.change.org/p/boundary-commission-for-e

> ngland-keep-camberwell-together-se5

>

> or short form

>

> http://chng.it/wdHV57b5sh


Oh dear, after reading all this paraphenalia, I don't think I could commit myself to signing anything on-line let alone off-line with regard to Southwark Council. They are not supporting the government at the moment.


Helen Hayes had her say in the Southwark News today and as usual she was allowed to exert her views in a local newspaper which has become very anti government.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...