Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I realise that by even engaging in a topic and expressing a preference one way or another, it can seem as if a discussion is binary, It can seem as if I am "TOTALLY AGAINST THIS SORT OF THING"


In reality I'm more like *bob* and his laissez-faire approach


Most of the things people mention on here do aggravate - but only tiny micro-readings on the aggrometer. Apart from people who put their bag on another seat ? they can F*** right off


I guess I engaged with this particular point precisely because of the apparent "why?" factor. It clearly does bother some people and it clearly surprises other people why that might be


"Why should people adopt an apologetic demeanour for this activity and not for any other? It's utterly nonsensical that people should care that you don't approve.


I hate the Metro - it's rubbish. But I don't judge people for not asking my permission to read it in my presence."


Introducing the "asking for permission" is interesting - no-one is suggesting any such thing. Can we take it that you might judge people for reading the metro at all? Maybe you do maybe you don't - but noone mentioned asking for permission


I hope LadyD's response was in jest - if it was serious it's frankly as misguided and bizaare as those homophobes and their "backs to the wall lads" banter. The gender of the people in question is irrelevant. As is their "readiness"


But if I had to express why it bothers me at all, it would be something like, we all have to leave the house in the morning and we all sort of accept that we aren't at home anymore so we do those things - washing our pits, brushing our teeth, shaving (and I would include make-up here) - before we leave the house. because it sort of seems anti-social otherwise. Why wouldn't you do your make-up before leaving the house? Would you genuinely not judge a bloke for shaving on the bus? That would be totally ok?


Every tut at the driver for braking, every swearword at a bump, from people applying make up on a bus makes me wonder how some people became so entitled


But by all means carry on if that's what you want. You don't need anyones permission. And hopefully Boris won't add it to his banned list.


Worth noting that even the much-missed and beknighted HonaloochieB found it aggravating


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/search.php?0,search=%22make+up+on+the+bus%22,page=1,match_type=ALL,match_dates=0,match_forum=ALL

You're joking, right?


LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Because you're women, doing women things,

> shattering the illusion that we somehow get out of

> bed already made up and ready for the men in our

> lives.

>

> And the fact we are blatantly not made up, not

> ready for the men, but don't give a shit, well how

> appalling is that?

>

> If you were obviously the kind of frump who

> doesn't bother to wear make up, then that wouldn't

> be so bad, but no, you clearly do bother, but not

> for us!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...