Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I?ve just checked - seems fine on C4.

> > (Tho I?m using Amazon for the match 9pm)

>

> Says unavailable live on both my laptop and My

> mobile 😭😭😭


What about the telly ?

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not watched much US Open Tennis before. Blimey

> they need to sort themselves out. Empty seats.

> Lots of shots of people on their phones. People

> popping down to the court for selfies in-between

> points. Heart of Glass.

> Thank god for Wimbledon.

> And well done Emma, fantastic.


There is a touch of the empty sports centre about it


Well done to her, but as a TV spectacle it needs some work.


Wimbledon is very classy in comparison.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I had it on terrestrial (C4) and Amazon (I

> have Prime) for duration.

> The C4 perhaps was available to me because not via

> Internet ?



Yes, someone else I know couldn't get it via internet either.


Very annoying,

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some well dodgy camera angle decisions during play

> as well

>

> But frankly what a fantastic spectacle, match and

> result

>



Yes, agree with both those.


Though doesn't anybody go to the net any more?! It's a long time since I watched any tennis!

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Though doesn't anybody go to the net any more?!

> It's a long time since I watched any tennis!


Yeah it's changed a lot. The serve-and-volley game largely died out when Nadal and Federer came to dominance. I've heard people say that volleying is no longer as effective due to heavier/softer balls...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...