Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *LIKE*

> This is my Saturday sorted and my kind of dish.


Glad you approve. It's supposed to contain tomatillos, but I have no idea where to get them. Maybe adding a squeeze of lime or a couple of gooseberries into the sauce give you the required tartness.

I suspect at least 97% of every conceivable recipe, barring superficial changes here and here, are already contained within the canon of cookbooks most people own.


I'm the same.. 800 recipes for baking fish already on the shelf but I still scamper to the cooker like a giddy teenager when another recipe for baking fish drops out of Take-A-Break.

Canon rather than cannon.


But even so I'm not sure the usage is quite right - canon means 'measuring stick', and is typically used when making comparisons.


So it can mean 'standard' but not in the sense of 'a standard (normal) repertoire', more in the sense of 'a standard (lofty values) I measure myself against'.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recipes are a bit like porn.

>

> You've already got fifty-three copies of Razzle

> but keep telling yourself copy fifty-four will be

> a game-changer.


Razzle = ready meal ?

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Recipes are a bit like porn.

> >

> > You've already got fifty-three copies of Razzle

> > but keep telling yourself copy fifty-four will

> be

> > a game-changer.

>

> Razzle = ready meal ?



Actually...


Razzle = ?1 ready meal ?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Canon rather than cannon.

>

> But even so I'm not sure the usage is quite right

> - canon means 'measuring stick', and is typically

> used when making comparisons.

>

> So it can mean 'standard' but not in the sense of

> 'a standard (normal) repertoire', more in the

> sense of 'a standard (lofty values) I measure

> myself against'.



I know what it means. I meant it.

This is what I cook when I feel guilty for not having proper home made food in ages and when I am back from work late. takes a minute to prepare and usually plenty of leftovers for the following day:


In casserole dish fry 1 chopped onion

Cut pack of sausages in half (or add them whole if so prefer) and brown.

Add whatever veg you have lurking in your fridge (chopped carrots, peppers, parsnips, etc). Stir a bit.

Add can of drained beans (aduki, chickpeans, lentils, red kidney beans - whatever you have in cupboard), stir a bit more.

Add tablespoon of flour, stir.

Add a bit of tomato puree and top of with boiled water (or buillion if you want to go the extra mile, or omit the puree and add jar of tomato passata instead). Add bay leaf.

Bring to boil then reduce to simmer until liquid reduced (usually about 15-20 minutes).


Serve with rice or mashed potato or pasta or quinoa or.....(you get the drift).

Refer to my original post please Mr Otta. I said there are a million and one recipes to be had on the web which makes it harder to choose so personal suggestions would make it easier. I have just shopped to make the pork stew and the sausage in cider. So there!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Canon rather than cannon.

>

yep, it's canon of course, but it can also mean a set of standard works e.g. literary canon - hence, by extension, WM's 'recipe canon'


to avoid straying off-topic here's an 'iconic' quick recipe for dal:


wash one cup of red lentils - make sure the water runs clear to avoid too much of the scummy stuff forming on top

chop an onion, some green chillies, garlic and ginger (how much? as much as you fancy)

optional - chop up any old veg in the fridge and add

put it all in a saucepan with 3 cups water

add half a teaspoon of turmeric and any or all of ground-up peppercorns/tomato paste/ground cumin/ground coriander

boil for about 15-20 minutes - when you're satisfied that the dal is done, add salt to taste


ultimate comfort food when teamed with rice/nan/chapatis and hot pickles

You are, of course, entirely within your rights to redefine whichever words you want to mean whatever the hell you want.


Good for you. You will have redefined the English language to be entirely unportable.


If you would prefer that we all understand each other, then my recommendation is to celebrate the nuance and creativity of your predecessors and stop imagining that some knuckle dragging simian saying woteva they wont weneva has equal value.


BTW, WorkingMummy, you were simply wrong. Get over it. I doubt you will ;-)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, it doesn't mean a set of standard works, it

> means a measuring stick, a comparative. Canon

> cannot be used as a replacement for 'portfolio'.

>

> Unless you don't know what it means.



Unless of course it's a musical canon, one definition means 'exactly' a set of existing great works which form a standard repertoire.


So culinary canon. And b0llocks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "Mysterious owners" 😆  If only there was a powerful search engine at our fingertips to find out such deep secrets.        
    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...