Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am trying to judge my chances for my child to get into various secondary schools

(I appreciate, the distance can change).


I know the furthest distance offered by the schools this year and the point from which they measure (aka, school gates, as the crow flies).


What I found confusing is that various sites give quite big variations, e.g. >200 difference vs e.g. google maps measure distance or other tools


Do we know what the council uses to work out the distances?

Thanks!

When i've looked at this in the past, there has been info in the admissions section detailing the eastings /northings coordinates you need to put into a map to get the point the measurement is done from.


Do you happen to have the furthest distance offered by Charter North please (and preferably in September rather than on initial offer day)?


Many thanks

Thank you for your comments OS coordinates, this is helpful.


The reason why I was questioning if google maps is accurate is that this website https://www.compare-school-performance.service.gov.uk/ also gives an indication of a distance but it's quite a bit different from the google maps measures for the school I am interested in (Charter ED). At 170m that would probably be the difference between admission or not...


Sorry, I don't know the furthest distance offered for Charter North - I heard two figures (857 and 1013) but cannot vouch for how accurate those are...

Ah, I don't know why the gov map would be different. Also worth remembering that Charter East Dulwich gets an extra form this year, although its virtually impossible to predict what it will do to the distance offered, largely depends on siblings, but reasonable to assume that the distance would increase from the prior year.

Thanks all!

I appreciate it's impossible to really predict, more a case of it's a totally impossibility or in with a chance.

I wonder if the gov. website is using the delivery entrance gate (not the one the school uses) - that would be a relief.


@boname, thank you very much - were those distances to the Charter ED or another school by chance?

(I did ask Google to convert the miles to meters as I wasn't trusting myself, lol!)

bonaome Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To what looks like the Charter ED gate on Jarvis

> Rd.

> I?m measuring to Bawdale.


thank again! This is so weird: the .gov.uk website says 0.62 miles which is 997m vs google maps (to jarvis road entrance) says 827m. Even giving it some margin to the actual school building entrance, google maps still says 847m.


Plus, I tried a couple of other maps tools that were also within meters of 827...

mima08 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bonaome Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > To what looks like the Charter ED gate on

> Jarvis

> > Rd.

> > I?m measuring to Bawdale.

>

> thank again! This is so weird: the .gov.uk website

> says 0.62 miles which is 997m vs google maps (to

> jarvis road entrance) says 827m. Even giving it

> some margin to the actual school building

> entrance, google maps still says 847m.

>

> Plus, I tried a couple of other maps tools that

> were also within meters of 827...


Very strange. Are other distances ?wrong? on Google maps for you? Try measuring the length of the lido and see if it says 50m.

@gebbjane - thank you! that is reassuring that it's not just me, and that the schools doesn't seem to be using that website!


@bonaome - thanks - no it seems just this distance and based on geggjane's post I think it's the gov. website that's wrong rather than google maps for me


Of course, all of this still doesn't guarantee anything but at least it gives me a little hope :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good luck with this - there have been several requests over the years by students needing to do infant observations.  I was lucky when I did mine  - way back in 1994 at a local nursery. Have you tried contacting the NCT to see if there are any local groups who would be willing to participate? As a mother of 2 - found the observation very informative - mine was a 2 year old child as my course stated a child under 3. Got my highest grade for this project so was very happy.
    • Happy birthday! I've just read a bunch of your reviews and really enjoyed it. You write Interestingly without being too ornate, and you manage to give a really good insight into the "vibe" of a place as well as the food. Totally agree with your review of Rocca - it's simple, great food in a friendly atmosphere at a completely reasonable price, esp considering the location.
    • Hello,  I am a 52-year old mother and an integrative counsellor who lives and works in West Dulwich, SE21. In mid January I am starting a new training in Parent Infant Psychotherapy (helping parents to bond with their babies), and a key component of the course is a 24-month infant observation.  I’m looking for someone who will be giving birth ideally in January or February and who would allow me to observe their baby for one hour a week until the baby’s second birthday. The baby can be awake or asleep, playing, feeding, eating or interacting with carer/s and family members - whatever they normally do at that time.  The purpose of the observation is to enable me to gain a thorough knowledge of very early infant development and to develop the capacity to maintain an observationally minded and non-judgemental attitude in my work as an infant-parent psychotherapist.  I will provide enhanced DBS clearance and I’m happy to answer any questions.  Please forward this email to anyone who might be interested, email me at [email protected] or call me on 07949716043. I would be extremely grateful for any leads. Many thanks,  Millie  Millie Burton, MBACP Integrative Counsellor [email protected] millieburton.com
    • I keep my promises...had the Sweet & Sour Chicken.  It was great - the best sweet and sour dish I've ever had. The chicken itself was good and the sauce seemed home made with real vegetables and pineapple - it is NOT the red sugar sauce goo you get elsewhere.  The Korean fried chicken was very good but the sweet chili sauce was much more chili than sweet - just far too spicy for me. There is a honey something sauce that I will get next time. Egg fried veggie rice was good as a side.  We also ordered the chicken katsu curry which was polished off so quickly I didn't get to taste it. It looked very good tho. SD is not like Magic Wok used to be - cheap and filling but junk food. (Don't get me wrong - I went often to Magic Wok). SD's food is much higher quality, real ingredients, chunky portions, freshly prepared. I'll be back, for sure.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...