Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Has anyone recently recovered from Covid and then flown to the US? We're hoping to travel at Christmas but won't be able to take a PCR test before travel as we'll still test positive for Covid then (it will be within the 90 days from our positive Covid test). The US says we need a letter from a healthcare provider proving a recovery from Covid but our GP surgery has just confirmed that they won't provide said letter. Not sure how we get around this! Any advice warmly welcomed. Thank you!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/296234-travel-after-covid-recovery/
Share on other sites

We're hoping to travel at Christmas but won't be able to take a PCR test before travel as we'll still test positive for Covid then (it will be within the 90 days from our positive Covid test)


You need to check with your GP - but I would expect you to test 'clear' (negative) within 14 days of no symptoms - some suggest 10 days. You would still expect antibodies in 90 days - but that's good - shows you are still actively able to attack a new infection.


You could still test positive more than 14 days after symptoms go (or after a positive test if it's asymptomatic) - but you could try it out with lateral flow tests before committing to a PCR. 90 days is a very wide estimate. Our own quarantine rules (England) have set a 14 day limit for quarantine.

Thanks so much Penguin68. Unfortunately, one can continue to test positive for 90 days after a positive case of Covid. When I spoke to our GP surgery earlier today, they confirmed this. Of course, one isn't contagious but the virus just remains in the system. Makes it a bit difficult for travel!
one can continue to test positive for 90 (My emphasis). Your GP is right, but I would certainly get yourselves tested closer to the day of departure (and lateral flows would be a good first step) - although you can it doesn't mean you will. And you could be clear (negative) much earlier.

I think there may be some confusion about the 90 day testing window including at your GP, although I'm not sure it helps your specific situation.


The reason that testing does not take place within 90 days of a positive Covid test is not because you can still be infectious for Covid (assuming you are only infected once) but because there is an increased risk of a false positive result and it would lead to people isolating unnecessarily.


So you could well take the test within 90 days and it would be negative in which case you can travel. The problem is that you might test positive, it would likely be a false positive, and you would be in a difficult position (Which is why the recommendation is the letter from a healthcare provider, but if your doctor won't give you this, I'm not sure who could).

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...
I look at you and understand that I can't afford to take the risk of buying tickets to other countries just for the holidays. There is still a good chance that flights will be canceled or new rules will emerge. I became accustomed to visit website and find interesting meetings near my house. I will travel only when I am sure that my trip will not be cancelled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...