Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a darling friend who is attending EDF drinks with me tonight... as part of my attempt to lure him from Sheffield to be my partner-in-crime in London.


Now - the deal-breaker, well not really - but a slight concern expresed to me is whether or not he is likely to meet the man of his dreams in East Dulwich. (Can I add that he has cheekbones to die for, and is himself the man of many men's dreams) .... and so I am wondering if Rainbow drinks do still exist? Certainly it was an idea knocking around last year .... did they happen, are they still happening ... and if so, can someone new join your gang?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2981-gay-men-rainbow-drinks/
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Vauxhall isn't far away.

> He can meet various men of his dreams - several

> times a week - if he moves down from Sheffield.



Sunday breakfast opening at "Fire", although that seems to be rather more GHB and ketamine than drinks and light-hearted chat with perfect man...

bignumber5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Sunday breakfast opening at "Fire", although that

> seems to be rather more GHB and ketamine than

> drinks and light-hearted chat with perfect man...


I'll let you know - we'll be there next weekend.

Word has it that there are plans afoot for Fire to 'go straight', as it happens.. what is the world coming to?!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> u know there's no such thing as a perfect man

> right?


Oh KalamityKel my love - I know only too well ... But if there was such a thing as a perfect man he would of course be gay...


Sigh.

cdonline Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's been said many times, I was in the Rye

> yesterday and was surprised just how many homos

> were in attendance.

>

> Fire is a bit of a shithole. The same music

> played over and over again while people get

> completely off their nut on K. Or maybe I'm just

> getting old.


Are you allowed to say Homos these days, I thought that was not considered PC. Aren't we supposed to say gay??

It's a potential minefield, Attila.


'Gay' is always your best bet at the time of writing. 'Gays' is ok too, but not 'The Gays' - which isn't.

'Queer' is fine too (since 'Queer as Folk' has been aired - you can't really complain) - but it sounds better coming from the gays themselves, not normal people.

'Bummer' is (apparently) ok if you listen Chris Moyles and read FHM. So they say.

'Faggot' is still out though, I'm afraid - though still very popular in many parts of America.


Personally I think it's time that 'fruit' made a comeback.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...