Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a darling friend who is attending EDF drinks with me tonight... as part of my attempt to lure him from Sheffield to be my partner-in-crime in London.


Now - the deal-breaker, well not really - but a slight concern expresed to me is whether or not he is likely to meet the man of his dreams in East Dulwich. (Can I add that he has cheekbones to die for, and is himself the man of many men's dreams) .... and so I am wondering if Rainbow drinks do still exist? Certainly it was an idea knocking around last year .... did they happen, are they still happening ... and if so, can someone new join your gang?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2981-gay-men-rainbow-drinks/
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Vauxhall isn't far away.

> He can meet various men of his dreams - several

> times a week - if he moves down from Sheffield.



Sunday breakfast opening at "Fire", although that seems to be rather more GHB and ketamine than drinks and light-hearted chat with perfect man...

bignumber5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Sunday breakfast opening at "Fire", although that

> seems to be rather more GHB and ketamine than

> drinks and light-hearted chat with perfect man...


I'll let you know - we'll be there next weekend.

Word has it that there are plans afoot for Fire to 'go straight', as it happens.. what is the world coming to?!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> u know there's no such thing as a perfect man

> right?


Oh KalamityKel my love - I know only too well ... But if there was such a thing as a perfect man he would of course be gay...


Sigh.

cdonline Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's been said many times, I was in the Rye

> yesterday and was surprised just how many homos

> were in attendance.

>

> Fire is a bit of a shithole. The same music

> played over and over again while people get

> completely off their nut on K. Or maybe I'm just

> getting old.


Are you allowed to say Homos these days, I thought that was not considered PC. Aren't we supposed to say gay??

It's a potential minefield, Attila.


'Gay' is always your best bet at the time of writing. 'Gays' is ok too, but not 'The Gays' - which isn't.

'Queer' is fine too (since 'Queer as Folk' has been aired - you can't really complain) - but it sounds better coming from the gays themselves, not normal people.

'Bummer' is (apparently) ok if you listen Chris Moyles and read FHM. So they say.

'Faggot' is still out though, I'm afraid - though still very popular in many parts of America.


Personally I think it's time that 'fruit' made a comeback.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...