Jump to content

Recommended Posts

media of all types full of binary opinions, but this blog *from music journo Dorian Lynskey - so unliely to be most qualified, and yet...) seems the best summary I've come across so far


http://33revolutionsperminute.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/assessing-hugo-chavez-1954-2013/

Improved dramatically the lot of the poor to electorate success, wether this will last in the long term will be the ultimate test...my suspicion is it was all on the credit card, but oil wealth has been spent far less fairly and unpleasantly in other oil rich places. So the binary view looks simplistic. Shade of the Perons for me.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Improved dramatically the lot of the poor to

> electorate success, wether this will last in the

> long term will be the ultimate test...my suspicion

> is it was all on the credit card, but oil wealth

> has been spent far less fairly and unpleasantly in

> other oil rich places. So the binary view looks

> simplistic. Shade of the Perons for me.


He onnly improved the lot of the poor by doling out oil money and nationalised industry cash. Not a good idea in the long term. Kudos to him for sticking up two fingers to the corrupt pro-USA oligarchs that preceded him, but thumbs down for the support for dictators elsewhere and the inability to see that the long-term prosperity of Venezuela must rely on a thriving local private sector - which is not the same as the hated Yankee corporations. Venezuela's economy is now embarrassingly mediocre given its oil wealth and I fear the Peron analogy will come to be seen as close to the truth.

As with most oil economies he appears to have spent it liberally on the poor but in the process killed the economy - they're borrowing large sums form China.

So whatever peoples views of what Chavez did it's entirely unsustainable.

It's a shame he couldnt have acheived greater equality in a lasting way.


The economy there, despite oil wealth, is under performing as it has for a number of years its neighbours. Large number of mega currency devlautions. So long term the current policies will lead to greater poverty and a mega crunch. Very sad.

"As with most oil economies he appears to have spent it liberally on the poor"


errrrrr...most oil economies are kleptocratic, they're rarely particularly magnanimous socially speaking.


And everybody is 'borrowing large sums from china'. It's not like we all go to the bank of china applying for loans.

We issue bonds and hope the market buys them, apart from the usual institutional types, the biggest buyer of national debt is China, for everyone.

This oft repeated refrain is a total red herring.


The economy was tanking before Chavez took power and he has reined in the worst excesses of rampant corruption that was by and large responsible for those troubles.


The economy isn't in dire straits now, it's just that compared to boom in Brazil and a resurgent Argentina (as fragile as that is) it could be said to have underperformed and not diversified from oil enough, but hardly a damning indictment of is it. And given S. Aerica's depressingly long history of popular coups turned bloody juntas, the past fifteen years have ben remarkably stable and peaceful.


Considering the abysmal human rights records and concentration of wealth in the leadership of our oil rich allies in the arabian peninsular or west africa, Venezuala is practically bloody Norway.


He seems to have become a pariah for daring to thumb his nose at the Monroe Doctrine frankly.


I for one will miss him if only for the donkey speech!!

"DaveR - I wan't aware of this. Do you have a link to any info on that?"


It has been reported quite widely - http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/18/hugo-chavez-revolution-corruption-claims


"he has reined in the worst excesses of rampant corruption that was by and large responsible for those troubles"


unfortunately that doesn't seem to be true either:


http://www.transparency.org/country#VEN_DataResearch_SurveysIndices


I think the best that can be said for Chavez is that, whilst he doersn't come anywhere near to living up to his own hype or that of some of his supporters, looking at the history of South American leaders, he could have been worse. This:


"He seems to have become a pariah for daring to thumb his nose at the Monroe Doctrine frankly"


is definitely letting him off the hook.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "As with most oil economies he appears to have

> spent it liberally on the poor"

>

> errrrrr...most oil economies are kleptocratic,

> they're rarely particularly magnanimous socially

> speaking.

>

> And everybody is 'borrowing large sums from

> china'. It's not like we all go to the bank of

> china applying for loans.

> We issue bonds and hope the market buys them,

> apart from the usual institutional types, the

> biggest buyer of national debt is China, for

> everyone.

> This oft repeated refrain is a total red herring.

>

> The economy was tanking before Chavez took power

> and he has reined in the worst excesses of rampant

> corruption that was by and large responsible for

> those troubles.

>

> The economy isn't in dire straits now, it's just

> that compared to boom in Brazil and a resurgent

> Argentina (as fragile as that is) it could be said

> to have underperformed and not diversified from

> oil enough, but hardly a damning indictment of is

> it. And given S. Aerica's depressingly long

> history of popular coups turned bloody juntas, the

> past fifteen years have ben remarkably stable and

> peaceful.

>

> Considering the abysmal human rights records and

> concentration of wealth in the leadership of our

> oil rich allies in the arabian peninsular or west

> africa, Venezuala is practically bloody Norway.

>

> He seems to have become a pariah for daring to

> thumb his nose at the Monroe Doctrine frankly.

>

> I for one will miss him if only for the donkey

> speech!!



Totally agree. Has done more for the poor in Venezuela than all of his detractors.

  • 2 weeks later...

Chillaxed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think comparing Chavez favourably to 'oil

> rich allies in the arabian peninsular or west

> africa' in any way validates his leadership.



i agree

an inspiration for his people, people of the region and progressives around the world

innovations in socialist transformation and democracy we can all learn from and will be the focus of discussion in future south London forums at Goldsmiths 30th April https://www.facebook.com/events/461366510600538/ and Lewisham TUC on May 14th for south east London trade union members-email [email protected] for details

his legacy is great and the people will continue the transformation for as long as US intervention is not successful-but they are pumping in millions to opposition parties

yes huguenot:

Chavez does inspire true revolutionaries and many many more

the first urban based revolution since 1917, very democratic, progressive on gay and lesbian rights, indigenous and afro descent rights,women's rights a revolution frorm the bottom and the top- 40,000 community councils run mainly by women running communities, targeting resources, participative democracy-for and by the community-the country's wealth used for education and free health-not on offshore banks for a few wealth billionaires-a regional and global inspiration

see forthcoming events by writing to [email protected] (lgvic above out of date)

also come along to this http://www.lewishamstopwar.org.uk/goldsmithsSTWvenezuela.pdf

Haha :)) that's your summary of the Chavez era?


Leaving aside its accuracy, you are aware that apart from the nationalization of resources you have just described most liberal modern democracies?


It speaks to the occluded vision of suburban revolutionaries that you couldn't see is as you wrote it.


By your description, the Chavez revolution was only to take on the attributes of modern Britain.


The next question is accuracy. Did Chavez really achieve all these things, or is it no more than the usual revolutionary rosy veneer over a seething mass of corrupt self interested autocrats?

So personal abuse isn?t allowed but abuse dressed around a barrage of long words that I don't understand is? There seems to be loads of abuse in a lot of threads like this. Actually seems more like bullying.


I never really went to school so consider myself to be fairly uneducated but that doesn't mean that I, and others, don't have valid opinions. The aggressive nature and intellectual bullying of some users on this site is appalling. I remember a recent post on another thread that was met with a response of 'Let me point out your fairly obvious mistake'. I'm not saying that some of the responses have no value but the way in which they delivered is ill considered and breeds contempt. Some users remind me of Jeremy Kyle, exploiting and embarrassing people of lesser social or educational understanding in order to achieve some sort of megalomaniac self appreciation.


Some might say toughen up but I was brought up to treat people the way I wanted to be treated. That goes for in person and online. Whereas I here things from other members like 'He's alright in person' so what makes being behind a computer completely change a personality?


Come on people encourage new users don't alienate them! Maybe they have something ground breaking to say albeit written in rhyming slang with no grammar!

The 'let me fix that for you' (and variations) is a regular joke across the Internet, it's ironic (because it hasn't 'fixed it' it's changed it) - I'm sorry you haven't come across it before.


Imagine Del Boy saying it, and you'll get the tone.


One of the first tips on Internet forums is to remember that the written word doesn't have any tone in it, so it's very easy to read negative intent that don't really exist


I have no idea about your level of education, and since nobody else brought it up it may be that you're assuming a criticism when it doesn't exist.


You weren't part of the discussion in the thread here, so it seems that you were bearing a grudge and looking to insult someone. That doesn't really seem much better than what you're accusing others of? It's basically trolling.


I don't think you necessarily have to 'toughen up' in the face of abuse or bullying - more to ask if there was any abuse or bullying in the first place.


Disagreeing with you is neither abuse nor bullying.


Either way, are you a Chavez revolutionary supporter?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What "stricter" consequences could there be for shoplifting (or any other crime) than being put into jail, do you think? Though our prisons are of course full enough already, without more people being shoehorned  into them.
    • Returning to the original question, I had my jabs at Tessa Jowell yesterday. I was early and I was  seen on time, and it was a lovely pharmacist who did them, but the admin beforehand (not by her) was a bit iffy. I was given forms to fill in but not told what to do with them afterwards, so I  presumed I had to take them into the consulting room, as the rest was supposed to be filled in by a clinician, but no! After some time had elapsed and I had found a seat (there was no information on where to sit either, so people were sitting in two separate areas, neither of which had many seats) my name was called and  the forms were taken behind the counter. Be aware if you don't have an appointment - even in the relatively short time I was there, three people turned up without appointments having been sent there by a GP (I presume) or having  previously been  asked by the pharmacy to come  back at a different time, and they were all sent away again because the pharmacy didn't have enough flu vaccine until the following day. I have no idea if this was due to a misunderstanding on the people's side, their GP's or the pharmacy's, but none of them were very happy, and one lady said she "couldn't keep coming back" 😭  At least one of them didn't seem to understand what he was being told, possibly due to a language issue. I felt quite sorry for the pharmacist, who was giving jabs all day on top of her usual workload but still managing to stay cheerful! Though she wasn't the one dealing with the unhappy people! I have a sore arm from the Covid jab (I chose to have the jabs in different arms), but no other ill effects so far, touch wood. 
    • Line speed and the strength of your Wi-Fi signal are two separate things.  The first is determined by the type of connection (fibre/copper etc) to the outside world and the second is the connection between the device (printer/TV/laptop/tablet etc) and the router. If you are connecting a device to the router using cables (as Alec1 is) then this is will give the best possible connection but isn't practical for many without a degree of upheaval and even then not all devices (tablets for example) will allow a wired connection. So you relying on the quality of the Wi-Fi signal from the router to the device and this will depend on the quality of the router, the type of Wi-Fi connection (the frequency), line of sight etc - many different things.  This is why some people opt for a "mesh" type setup which is supposed to give a solid quality of Wi-Fi signal around the house with little or no blackspots.  It's expensive though and still requires the devices that send and receive the signal (like the plug-ins you have) to be wired to the router.
    • We have had a few cat flaps over the years but none have been electronic. They just have a small clip that you turn to lock or open.  Some come with a magnet and a matching magnet that the cat wears on its collar  This prevents other cats entering.  I've not used these as I don't like the idea of a cat wearing a collar. Cats do like to be out at night and you need to encourage yours to return after a late evening sortie. Calling,rustling treat wrappers worked for ours but he seems to have now got into the habit of coming back about 9pm. without this.        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...