Jump to content

The old Mag Pub on Lordship Lane (The Patch)


gazza_g

Recommended Posts

I don't get it. Why would I give money I've worked for to someone setting up a commercial venture even if it is ?independent? and a ?community? based business and I don't get a stake. I must be missing something here so I would be grateful if someone would enlighten me.

In answer to the question, why pledge?


I think it depends on the individual. Personally I liked The Mag as it was 12-18 months ago - good food and a nice environment to have a drink. If pledging a sum that I felt comfortable with (which of course will vary from person to person) means that we retain that, then that would be my motivation. I wouldn't classify it as a subsidy, just an investment in the community for which I hope to get a (non-monetary) return. If I get a couple of drinks and herbs / groceries thrown in then I'm probably better off than when I usually go to the pub in the evening!


Personally I'm not too keen on The Mag showing football etc but that is only my view and I'm sure that many will disagree.

Whilst I do think Sue's questions are fair and do need answering, on balance I would have called Green and Blue a local independent but I guess that they ultimatly don't own the freehold of the building they were in, they will most likely have been leaseholders, as with many of the local independents. A pub operating from a leasehold premises could therefore also, in theory, be classified and treated as an independent. The lack of brewrey pricing tie is obvioulsy a step towards this but what the actual terms of the lease/deal are would define this particular business' status.
Why pledge? That's personal, of course, but for me it's about being able to help an idea I like come to fruition. Patch is the third crowdfunding project I've contributed to. The first was for a bike light that projects a laser image of cyclist onto the road in front of the cyclist so that drivers of trucks and buses can see that there is a cyclist there. It was such a popular idea that it met its target twice over. Arguably that project has a broader appeal than The Patch so it's in my interests to get the word out to neighbours who might want to benefit from the project and to promote it on social media - hence my comment on their FB site.

Hmm, I think we are at cross purposes here, PandG. I made a positive comment about The Patch on their Facebook site and I was referring to that and the importance of getting more people aware of the project, pointing them in the direction of the Kickstarter site and encouraging more people to pledge. I don't see what that has to do with cycling.

ETA the bike light reference was to a project that people saw as a good idea. The communications by the project people on the progress of their idea's development and the take up by supporters was clear, enthusiastic and engaging.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...